ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model
Jiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, James Thorne
Abstract
While recent preference alignment algorithms for language models have demonstrated promising results, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) remains imperative for achieving successful convergence. In this paper, we revisit SFT in the context of preference alignment, emphasizing that a minor penalty for the disfavored style is sufficient for preference alignment. Building on this foundation, we introduce a straightforward reference model-free monolithic odds ratio preference optimization algorithm, ORPO, eliminating the need for an additional preference alignment phase. We demonstrate, both empirically and theoretically, that the odds ratio is a sensible choice for contrasting favored and disfavored styles during SFT across diverse sizes from 125M to 7B. Specifically, finetuning Phi-2 (2.7B), Llama-2 (7B), and Mistral (7B) with ORPO on the UltraFeedback alone surpasses the performance of state-of-the-art language models including Llama-2 Chat and Zephyr with more than 7B and 13B parameters: achieving up to 12.20% on AlpacaEval 2.0 (Figure 1 ), and 7.32 in MT-Bench (Table 2 ). We release code 1 and model checkpoints 2 for Mistral-ORPO-α and Mistral-ORPO-β.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 477937e6-3547-4dad-8ff6-7bdf458eb361Cited by top-tier papers115
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy DataFahim Tajwar, Anikait Singh, Archit Sharma, Rafael Rafailov et al.ICML 2024 · 189 citations
- Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference FeedbackHamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Jiacheng Liu, Zeqiu Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βJunkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 114 citations
- wd1: Weighted Policy Optimization for Reasoning in Diffusion Language ModelsXiaohang Tang, Rares Dolga, Sangwoong Yoon, Ilija BogunovicICLR 2026 · 70 citations
Builds on14
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
Related papers
- Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model AlignmentYue Wu, Zhiqing Sun, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICLR 2025
- SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without HyperparametersTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Zhengyu Chen, Mingxiao Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- RLHF Can Speak Many Languages: Unlocking Multilingual Preference Optimization for LLMsJohn Dang, Arash Ahmadian, Kelly Marchisio, Julia Kreutzer et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Model Extrapolation Expedites AlignmentChujie Zheng, Ziqi Wang, Heng Ji, Minlie Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 34 citations
