Mesh Based Simulations with Spatial and Temporal awareness
Paul Garnier, Vincent Lannelongue, Elie Hachem
Abstract
Machine Learning surrogates for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), particularly Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformers, have become a new important approach for accelerating physics simulations. However, we identify a critical bottleneck in the field: while architectures have advanced significantly, the common underlying training paradigms remain bound to naive assumptions, such as node-wise supervision and explicit Euler time-stepping. These legacy choices ignore the stiff dynamics and local flux continuity inherent to numerous partial differential equations resolution methods, such as Finite Element, Difference, or Volume (FEM). In this work, we propose a unified framework to bridge the gap between geometric deep learning and rigorous numerical analysis. We introduce three key innovations: (1) Multi Node Prediction, a stencil-level objective that predicts field values for a node's full local topology, enforcing spatial derivative consistency; (2) Temporal Correction, replacing unstable explicit schemes with a predictor–corrector via temporal Cross-Attention; and (3) Geometric Inductive Biases, leveraging 3D Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE) to robustly capture rotational symmetries in unstructured meshes. We evaluate this framework across three architectures (MeshGraphNet, Transolver, and a Transformer) on diverse physics datasets. Our approach yields consistent improvements in accuracy and stability, particularly in long-horizon rollouts, while producing latent representations that generalize to unseen subtasks such as Wall Shear Stress or Pressure prediction. Code is available at https://github.com/DonsetPG/graph-physics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 476359e5-a97c-4e64-a519-b99c9ecda79fBuilds on16
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph NetworksTobias Pfaff, Meire Fortunato, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. BattagliaICLR 2021 · 1,175 citations
- Point Transformer V2: Grouped Vector Attention and Partition-based PoolingXiaoyang Wu, Yixing Lao, Li Jiang, Xihui Liu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 924 citations
- Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral AttentionDevin Kreuzer, Dominique Beaini, William L. Hamilton, Vincent Létourneau et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 854 citations
Related papers
- Transolver-3: Scaling Up Transformer Solvers to Industrial-Scale GeometriesHang Zhou, Haixu Wu, Haonan Shangguan, Yuezhou Ma et al.ICML 2026
- Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural OperatorsBenedikt Alkin, Andreas Fürst, Simon Schmid, Lukas Gruber et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General GeometriesHaixu Wu, Huakun Luo, Haowen Wang, Jianmin Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 228 citations
- Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow PredictionFilipe de Avila Belbute-Peres, Thomas D. Economon, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 271 citations
- Geometry Aware Operator Transformer as an efficient and accurate neural surrogate for PDEs on arbitrary domainsShizheng Wen, Arsh Kumbhat, Levi E. Lingsch, Sepehr Mousavi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 73 citations
