Latent Plan Transformer for Trajectory Abstraction: Planning as Latent Space Inference
Deqian Kong, Dehong Xu, Minglu Zhao, Bo Pang, Jianwen Xie, Andrew Lizarraga, Yuhao Huang, Sirui Xie, Ying Nian Wu
Abstract
In tasks aiming for long-term returns, planning becomes essential. We study generative modeling for planning with datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning. Specifically, we identify temporal consistency in the absence of step-wise rewards as one key technical challenge. We introduce the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel model that leverages a latent variable to connect a Transformer-based trajectory generator and the final return. LPT can be learned with maximum likelihood estimation on trajectory-return pairs. In learning, posterior sampling of the latent variable naturally integrates sub-trajectories to form a consistent abstraction despite the finite context. At test time, the latent variable is inferred from an expected return before policy execution, realizing the idea of planning as inference. Our experiments demonstrate that LPT can discover improved decisions from sub-optimal trajectories, achieving competitive performance across several benchmarks, including Gym-Mujoco, Franka Kitchen, Maze2D, and Connect Four. It exhibits capabilities in nuanced credit assignments, trajectory stitching, and adaptation to environmental contingencies. These results validate that latent variable inference can be a strong alternative to step-wise reward prompting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Molecule Design by Latent Prompt TransformerDeqian Kong, Yuhao Huang, Jianwen Xie, Edouardo Honig et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Ada-Diffuser: Latent-Aware Adaptive Diffusion for Decision-MakingFan Feng, Selena Ge, Minghao Fu, Zijian Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Latent Thought Models with Variational Bayes Inference-Time ComputationDeqian Kong, Minglu Zhao, Dehong Xu, Bo Pang et al.ICML 2025
Builds on26
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Decision Transformer via Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Hebin Liang, Chenjun XiaoICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling ProblemMichael Janner, Qiyang Li, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 950 citations
- Diffused Task-Agnostic Milestone PlannerMineui Hong, Minjae Kang, Songhwai OhNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLTaku Yamagata, Ahmed Khalil, Raúl Santos-RodríguezICML 2023 · 121 citations
- Reasoning with Latent Diffusion in Offline Reinforcement LearningSiddarth Venkatraman, Shivesh Khaitan, Ravi Tej Akella, John M. Dolan et al.ICLR 2024 · 39 citations
