Mitigating Perception Bias: A Training-Free Approach to Enhance LMM for Image Quality Assessment
Baoliang Chen, Siyi Pan, Dongxu Wu, Liang Xie, Xiangjie Sui, Lingyu Zhu, Hanwei Zhu
Abstract
Despite the impressive performance of large multimodal models (LMMs) in high-level visual tasks, their capacity for image quality assessment (IQA) remains limited. One main reason is that LMMs are primarily trained for high-level tasks (e.g., image captioning), emphasizing unified image semantics extraction under varied quality. Such semantic-aware yet quality-insensitive perception bias inevitably leads to a heavy reliance on image semantics when those LMMs are forced for quality rating. In this paper, instead of retraining or tuning an LMM costly, we propose a training-free debiasing framework, in which the image quality prediction is rectified by mitigating the bias caused by image semantics. Specifically, we first explore several semantic-preserving distortions that can significantly degrade image quality while maintaining identifiable semantics. By applying these specific distortions to the query/test images, we ensure that the degraded images are recognized as poor quality while their semantics remain. During quality inference, both a query image and its corresponding degraded version are fed to the LMM along with a prompt indicating that the query image quality should be inferred under the condition that the degraded one is deemed poor quality. This prior condition effectively aligns the LMM’s quality perception, as all degraded images are consistently rated as poor quality, regardless of their semantic difference. Finally, the quality scores of the query image inferred under different prior conditions (degraded versions) are aggregated using a conditional probability model. Extensive experiments on various IQA datasets show that our debiasing framework could consistently enhance the LMM performance and the code will be publicly available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 470dd13b-8241-49aa-bba6-da71c9046a89Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality TransformerJunjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,325 citations
- Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of ImagesJianyi Wang, Kelvin C. K. Chan, Chen Change LoyAAAI 2023 · 1,208 citations
- MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated CapabilitiesWeihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 1,191 citations
- Q-Ground: Image Quality Grounding with Large Multi-modality ModelsChaofeng Chen, Sensen Yang, Haoning Wu, Liang Liao et al.ACM MM 2024 · 16 citations
- TraveLER: A Modular Multi-LMM Agent Framework for Video Question-AnsweringChuyi Shang, Amos You, Sanjay Subramanian, Trevor Darrell et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Penalization of Language PriorsYifan Zhang, Yang Shi, Weichen Yu, Qingsong Wen et al.ACM MM 2025 · 6 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores Using Score DistributionZhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue et al.CVPR 2025
- Revisiting MLLM Based Image Quality Assessment: Errors and RemedyZhenchen Tang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zichuan Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the WildAvinab Saha, Sandeep Mishra, Alan C. BovikCVPR 2023
- Logit-Attention Divergence: Mitigating Position Bias in Multi-Image Retrieval via Attention-Guided CalibrationMingtao Xian, Yifeng Yang, Qinying Gu, Xinbing Wang et al.ICML 2026
