Wormhole Loss for Partial Shape Matching
Amit Bracha, Thomas Dagès, Ron Kimmel
Abstract
When matching parts of a surface to its whole, a fundamental question arises: Which points should be included in the matching process? The issue is intensified when using isometry to measure similarity, as it requires the validation of whether distances measured between pairs of surface points should influence the matching process. The approach we propose treats surfaces as manifolds equipped with geodesic distances, and addresses the partial shape matching challenge by introducing a novel criterion to meticulously search for consistent distances between pairs of points. The new criterion explores the relation between intrinsic geodesic distances between the points, geodesic distances between the points and surface boundaries, and extrinsic distances between boundary points measured in the embedding space. It is shown to be less restrictive compared to previous measures and achieves state-of-the-art results when used as a loss function in training networks for partial shape matching.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 46ce5c44-80ed-40bd-9734-7bd0c51c597dCited by top-tier papers8
- DiffuMatch: Category-Agnostic Spectral Diffusion Priors for Robust Non-Rigid Shape MatchingEmery Pierson, Lei Li, Angela Dai, Maks OvsjanikovICCV 2025 · 5 citations
- Adaptive Canonicalization with Application to Invariant Anisotropic Geometric NetworksYa-Wei Eileen Lin, Ron LevieICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Teaching DINOv3 About Partial 3D Geometry: A Self-Supervised Geometry-Aware ApproachViktoria Ehm, Dongliang Cao, Riccardo Marin, Daniel Scholz et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- From Feature Learning to Spectral Basis Learning: A Unifying and Flexible Framework for Efficient and Robust Shape MatchingFeifan Luo, Hongyang ChenCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- SGSoft: Learning Fused Semantic-Geometric Features for 3D Shape Correspondence via Template-Guided Soft SignalsSoyeon Yoon, Chang Wook Seo, Hyunjung ShimCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape MatchingJean-Michel Roufosse, Abhishek Sharma, Maks OvsjanikovICCV 2019 · 160 citations
- Correspondence learning via linearly-invariant embeddingRiccardo Marin, Marie-Julie Rakotosaona, Simone Melzi, Maks OvsjanikovNeurIPS 2020 · 82 citations
- Weakly Supervised Deep Functional Maps for Shape MatchingAbhishek Sharma, Maks OvsjanikovNeurIPS 2020 · 58 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Robust Spectral Shape MatchingDongliang Cao, Paul Roetzer, Florian BernardSIGGRAPH 2023 · 45 citations
- Partial-to-Partial Shape Matching with Geometric ConsistencyViktoria Ehm, Maolin Gao, Paul Roetzer, Marvin Eisenberger et al.CVPR 2024
Related papers
- InfoCD: A Contrastive Chamfer Distance Loss for Point Cloud CompletionFangzhou Lin, Yun Yue, Ziming Zhang, Songlin Hou et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 49 citations
- From Extrinsic to Intrinsic: Geodesic-Guided Representation Learning for 3D Geometric DataYuming ZHAO, Junhui Hou, Qijian Zhang, Jia Qin et al.ICML 2026
- EchoMatch: Partial-to-Partial Shape Matching via Correspondence ReflectionYizheng Xie, Viktoria Ehm, Paul Roetzer, Nafie El Amrani et al.CVPR 2025
- Deep Confidence Guided Distance for 3D Partial Shape RegistrationDvir Ginzburg, Dan RavivAAAI 2022 · 3 citations
- Manifold Matching via Deep Metric Learning for Generative ModelingMengyu Dai, Haibin HangICCV 2021 · 16 citations
