Demystifying Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning for Upper Extremity Interaction: Practical Guidelines for Biomechanical Simulations in HCI
Hannah Selder, Florian Fischer, Per Ola Kristensson, Arthur Fleig
Abstract
Designing effective reward functions is critical for reinforcement learning-based biomechanical simulations, yet HCI researchers and practitioners often waste (computation) time with unintuitive trial-and-error tuning. This paper demystifies reward function design by systematically analyzing the impact of effort minimization, task completion bonuses, and target proximity incentives on typical HCI tasks such as pointing, tracking, and choice reaction. We show that proximity incentives are essential for guiding movement, while completion bonuses ensure task success. Effort terms, though optional, help refine motion regularity when appropriately scaled. We perform an extensive analysis of how sensitive task success and completion time depend on the weights of these three reward components. From these results we derive practical guidelines to create plausible biomechanical simulations without the need for reinforcement learning expertise, which we then validate on remote control and keyboard typing tasks. This paper advances simulation-based interaction design and evaluation in HCI by improving the efficiency and applicability of biomechanical user modeling for real-world interface development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 46a06354-c1cd-4032-99e7-d69755d2cd84Builds on12
- Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward ShapingYujing Hu, Weixun Wang, Hangtian Jia, Yixiang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 256 citations
- The Perils of Trial-and-Error Reward Design: Misdesign through Overfitting and Invalid Task SpecificationsSerena Booth, W. Bradley Knox, Julie Shah, Scott Niekum et al.AAAI 2023 · 103 citations
- Predicting Mid-Air Interaction Movements and Fatigue Using Deep Reinforcement LearningNoshaba Cheema, Laura A. Frey-Law, Kourosh Naderi, Jaakko Lehtinen et al.CHI 2020 · 66 citations
- Explicable Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning AgentsRati Devidze, Goran Radanovic, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Adish SinglaNeurIPS 2021 · 60 citations
- Latent exploration for Reinforcement LearningAlberto Silvio Chiappa, Alessandro Marin Vargas, Ann Zixiang Huang, Alexander MathisNeurIPS 2023 · 41 citations
Related papers
- Breathing Life Into Biomechanical User ModelsAleksi Ikkala, Florian Fischer, Markus Klar, Miroslav Bachinski et al.UIST 2022 · 33 citations
- Log2Motion: Biomechanical Motion Synthesis from Touch LogsMichal Patryk Miazga, Hannah Bussmann, Antti Oulasvirta, Patrick EbelCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- QuestEnvSim: Environment-Aware Simulated Motion Tracking from Sparse SensorsSunmin Lee, Sebastian Starke, Yuting Ye, Jungdam Won et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 31 citations
- A Simulation Model of Intermittently Controlled Point-and-Click BehaviourSeungwon Do, Minsuk Chang, Byungjoo LeeCHI 2021 · 31 citations
- Touchscreen Typing As Optimal Supervisory ControlJussi Jokinen, Aditya Acharya, Mohammad Uzair, Xinhui Jiang et al.CHI 2021 · 105 citations
