Diffusion Negative Preference Optimization Made Simple
Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Hee Suk Yoon, Sunjae Yoon, Tri Ton, Chang Yoo
Abstract
Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) improves diffusion sampling by encouraging conditional generations while discouraging unconditional ones. Existing preference alignment methods, however, focus only on positive preference pairs, limiting their ability to actively suppress undesirable outputs. Diffusion Negative Preference Optimization (Diff-NPO) approaches this limitation by introducing a separate negative model trained with inverted labels, allowing it to capture signals for suppressing undesirable generations. However, this design comes with two key drawbacks. First, maintaining two distinct models throughout training and inference substantially increases computational cost, making the approach less practical. Second, at inference time, Diff-NPO relies on weight merging between the positive and negative models, a process that dilutes the learned negative alignment and undermines its effectiveness. To overcome these issues, we introduce Diff-SNPO, a single-network framework that jointly learns from both positive and negative preferences. Our method employs a bounded preference objective to prevent winner-likelihood collapse, ensuring stable optimization. Diff-SNPO delivers strong alignment performance with significantly lower computational overhead, showing that explicit negative preference modeling can be simple, stable, and efficient within a unified diffusion framework. Code and models are available at https://github.com/JoshuaTTJ/DiffSNPO..
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 469e937d-010d-4813-93f0-9bc21a167bc0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on27
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
Related papers
- Diffusion-NPO: Negative Preference Optimization for Better Preference Aligned Generation of Diffusion ModelsFu-Yun Wang, Yunhao Shui, Jingtan Piao, Keqiang Sun et al.ICLR 2025
- Self-NPO: Data-Free Diffusion Model Enhancement via Truncated Diffusion Fine-TuningFu-Yun Wang, Keqiang Sun, Yao Teng, Xihui Liu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- ContrastiveCFG: Guiding Diffusion Sampling by Contrasting Positive and Negative ConceptsJinho Chang, Changsun Lee, Hyungjin Chung, Jong Chul YEICML 2026
- Normalized Attention Guidance: Universal Negative Guidance for Diffusion ModelsDar-Yen Chen, Hmrishav Bandyopadhyay, Kai Zou, Yi-Zhe SongNeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Inversion-DPO: Precise and Efficient Post-Training for Diffusion ModelsZejian Li, Yize Li, Chenye Meng, Zhongni Liu et al.ACM MM 2025
