NOVER: Incentive Training for Language Models via Verifier-Free Reinforcement Learning
Wei Liu, Siya Qi, Xinyu Wang, Chen Qian, Yali Du, Yulan He
Abstract
Recent advances such as DeepSeek R1-Zero highlight the effectiveness of incentive training, a reinforcement learning paradigm that computes rewards solely based on the final answer part of a language model's output, thereby encouraging the generation of intermediate reasoning steps. However, these methods fundamentally rely on external verifiers, which limits their applicability to domains like mathematics and coding where such verifiers are readily available. Although reward models can serve as verifiers, they require high-quality annotated data and are costly to train. In this work, we propose NOVER, NO-VERifier Reinforcement Learning, a general reinforcement learning framework that requires only standard supervised fine-tuning data with no need for an external verifier. NOVER enables incentive training across a wide range of text-to-text tasks and outperforms the model of the same size distilled from large reasoning models such as DeepSeek R1 671B by 7.7 percent. Moreover, the flexibility of NOVER enables new possibilities for optimizing large language models, such as inverse incentive training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4640bf7d-3953-47b4-9efe-c4a9e88228ecCited by top-tier papers6
- RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining ObjectiveAli Hatamizadeh, Syeda Nahida Akter, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Jan Kautz et al.ICLR 2026 · 26 citations
- Intrinsic Credit Assignment for Long Horizon InteractionIlze Amanda Auzina, Joschka Strüber, Sergio Hernández-Gutiérrez, Shashwat Goel et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Efficient Process Reward Modeling via Contrastive Mutual InformationNakyung Lee, Sangwoo Hong, Jungwoo LeeACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Optimizing User Profiles via Contextual Bandits for Retrieval-Augmented LLM PersonalizationLinfeng Du, Ye Yuan, Zichen Zhao, Fuyuan Lyu et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Beyond Perplexity: Let the Reader Select Retrieval Summaries via Spectrum Projection ScoreZhanghao Hu, Qinglin Zhu, Siya Qi, Yulan He et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on22
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
Related papers
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Reinforcing General Reasoning Without VerifiersXiangxin Zhou, Zichen Liu, Anya Sims, Haonan Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 75 citations
- General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All DomainsXueguang Ma, Qian Liu, Dongfu Jiang, Ge Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 153 citations
- Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero DataAndrew Zhao, Yiran Wu, Tong Wu, Quentin Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 361 citations
- AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement LearningYang Chen, Zhuolin Yang, Zihan Liu, Chankyu Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
