A fine-grained computational interpretation of Girard's intuitionistic proof-nets
Delia Kesner
Abstract
This paper introduces a functional term calculus, called pn, that captures the essence of the operational semantics of Intuitionistic Linear Logic Proof-Nets with a faithful degree of granularity, both statically and dynamically. On the static side, we identify an equivalence relation on pn-terms which is sound and complete with respect to the classical notion of structural equivalence for proof-nets. On the dynamic side, we show that every single (exponential) step in the term calculus translates to a different single (exponential) step in the graphical formalism, thus capturing the original Girard’s granularity of proof-nets but on the level of terms. We also show some fundamental properties of the calculus such as confluence, strong normalization, preservation of β-strong normalization and the existence of a strong bisimulation that captures pairs of pn-terms having the same graph reduction.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Pushdown Normal-Form Bisimulation: A Nominal Context-Free Approach to Program EquivalenceVasileios Koutavas, Yu-Yang Lin, Nikos TzevelekosLICS 2024 · 1 citation
- Higher Order Bayesian Networks, ExactlyClaudia Faggian, Daniele Pautasso, Gabriele VanoniPOPL 2024 · 4 citations
- Fully Abstract Normal Form Bisimulation for Call-by-Value PCFVasileios Koutavas, Yu-Yang Lin, Nikos TzevelekosLICS 2023 · 8 citations
- Why Are Proofs Relevant in Proof-Relevant Models?Axel Kerinec, Giulio Manzonetto, Federico OlimpieriPOPL 2023 · 6 citations
- Bialgebraic Reasoning on Higher-order Program EquivalenceSergey Goncharov, Stefan Milius, Stelios Tsampas, Henning UrbatLICS 2024 · 4 citations
