Blocker and Matcher Can Mutually Benefit: A Co-Learning Framework for Low-Resource Entity Resolution
Shiwen Wu, Qiyu Wu, Honghua Dong, Wen Hua, Xiaofang Zhou
Abstract
Entity resolution (ER) approaches typically consist of a blocker and a matcher. They share the same goal and cooperate in different roles: the blocker first quickly removes obvious non-matches, and the matcher subsequently determines whether the remaining pairs refer to the same real-world entity. Despite the state-of-the-art performance achieved by deep learning methods in ER, these techniques often rely on a large amount of labeled data for training, which can be challenging or costly to obtain. Thus, there is a need to develop effective ER systems under low-resource settings. In this work, we propose an end-to-end iterative Co-learning framework for ER, aimed at jointly training the blocker and the matcher by leveraging their cooperative relationship. In particular, we let the blocker and the matcher share their learned knowledge with each other via iteratively updated pseudo labels, which broaden the supervision signals. To mitigate the impact of noise in pseudo labels, we develop optimization techniques from three aspects: label generation, label selection and model training. Through extensive experiments on benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms baselines by an average of 9.13--51.55%. Furthermore, our analysis confirms that our framework achieves mutual benefits between the blocker and the matcher.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 45e85212-49d1-40e7-bd8d-d169cb0faa67Cited by top-tier papers2
- Featurized-Decomposition Join: Low-Cost Semantic Joins with GuaranteesSepanta Zeighami, Shreya Shankar, Aditya G. ParameswaranVLDB 2026 · 11 citations
- Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?Mengshi Chen, Yuxiang Sun, Tengchao Li, Jianwei Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language ModelsYuliang Li, Jinfeng Li, Yoshihiko Suhara, AnHai Doan et al.VLDB 2021 · 484 citations
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
Related papers
- Deep Learning for Blocking in Entity Matching: A Design Space ExplorationSaravanan Thirumuruganathan, Han Li, Nan Tang, Mourad Ouzzani et al.VLDB 2021 · 109 citations
- Domain Adaptation for Deep Entity ResolutionJianhong Tu, Ju Fan, Nan Tang, Peng Wang et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 46 citations
- Deep Indexed Active Learning for Matching Heterogeneous Entity RepresentationsArjit Jain, Sunita Sarawagi, Prithviraj SenVLDB 2022 · 32 citations
- The Battleship Approach to the Low Resource Entity Matching ProblemBar Genossar, Avigdor Gal, Roee ShragaSIGMOD 2024 · 6 citations
- Crowdsourced Collective Entity Resolution with Relational Match PropagationJiacheng Huang, Wei Hu, Zhifeng Bao, Yuzhong QuICDE 2020 · 4 citations
