Perception of Line Attributes for Visualization
Anna Sterzik, Nils Lichtenberg, Jana Wilms, Michael Krone, Douglas W. Cunningham, Kai Lawonn
Abstract
Line attributes such as width and dashing are commonly used to encode information. However, many questions on the perception of line attributes remain, such as how many levels of attribute variation can be distinguished or which line attributes are the preferred choices for which tasks. We conducted three studies to develop guidelines for using stylized lines to encode scalar data. In our first study, participants drew stylized lines to encode uncertainty information. Uncertainty is usually visualized alongside other data. Therefore, alternative visual channels are important for the visualization of uncertainty. Additionally, uncertainty-e.g., in weather forecasts-is a familiar topic to most people. Thus, we picked it for our visualization scenarios in study 1. We used the results of our study to determine the most common line attributes for drawing uncertainty: Dashing, luminance, wave amplitude, and width. While those line attributes were especially common for drawing uncertainty, they are also commonly used in other areas. In studies 2 and 3, we investigated the discriminability of the line attributes determined in study 1. Studies 2 and 3 did not require specific application areas; thus, their results apply to visualizing any scalar data in line attributes. We evaluated the just-noticeable differences (JND) and derived recommendations for perceptually distinct line levels. We found that participants could discriminate considerably more levels for the line attribute width than for wave amplitude, dashing, or luminance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 45c023ef-3f49-4b41-8210-9d740099f8e0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Perceptually Uniform Construction of Illustrative TexturesAnna Sterzik, Monique Meuschke, Douglas W. Cunningham, Kai LawonnIEEE VIS 2023 · 7 citations
- Uncertain Pointer: Situated Feedforward Visualizations for Ambiguity-Aware AR Target SelectionChing-Yi Tsai, Nicole Tacconi, Andrew D. Wilson, Parastoo AbtahiCHI 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- A Bayesian cognition approach for belief updating of correlation judgement through uncertainty visualizationsAlireza Karduni, Douglas Markant, Ryan Wesslen, Wenwen DouIEEE VIS 2020 · 34 citations
- Multiple Forecast Visualizations (MFVs): Trade-offs in Trust and Performance in Multiple COVID-19 Forecast VisualizationsLace M. K. Padilla, Racquel Fygenson, Spencer C. Castro, Enrico BertiniIEEE VIS 2022 · 43 citations
- Perception of letter glyph parameters for InfoTypographyJohannes Lang, Miguel A. NacentaSIGGRAPH 2022 · 4 citations
- Lost in Magnitudes: Exploring Visualization Designs for Large Value RangesKaterina Batziakoudi, Florent Cabric, Stéphanie Rey, Jean-Daniel FeketeCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- That's Rough! Encoding Data into Roughness for PhysicalizationXiaojiao Du, Kadek Ananta Satriadi, Adam Drogemuller, Brandon J. Matthews et al.CHI 2024 · 4 citations
