Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferences
Damien Ferbach, Quentin Bertrand, Avishek Joey Bose, Gauthier Gidel
Abstract
The rapid progress in generative models has resulted in impressive leaps in generation quality, blurring the lines between synthetic and real data. Web-scale datasets are now prone to the inevitable contamination by synthetic data, directly impacting the training of future generated models. Already, some theoretical results on self-consuming generative models (a.k.a., iterative retraining) have emerged in the literature, showcasing that either model collapse or stability could be possible depending on the fraction of generated data used at each retraining step. However, in practice, synthetic data is often subject to human feedback and curated by users before being used and uploaded online. For instance, many interfaces of popular text-to-image generative models, such as Stable Diffusion or Midjourney, produce several variations of an image for a given query which can eventually be curated by the users. In this paper, we theoretically study the impact of data curation on iterated retraining of generative models and show that it can be seen as an implicit preference optimization mechanism. However, unlike standard preference optimization, the generative model does not have access to the reward function or negative samples needed for pairwise comparisons. Moreover, our study doesn't require access to the density function, only to samples. We prove that, if the data is curated according to a reward model, then the expected reward of the iterative retraining procedure is maximized. We further provide theoretical results on the stability of the retraining loop when using a positive fraction of real data at each step. Finally, we conduct illustrative experiments on both synthetic datasets and on CIFAR10 showing that such a procedure amplifies biases of the reward model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization PerspectiveLianghe Shi, Meng Wu, Huijie Zhang, Zekai Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Ambient Diffusion Omni: Training Good Models with Bad DataGiannis Daras, Adrián Rodríguez-Muñoz, Adam R. Klivans, Antonio Torralba et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model TrainingKareem Amin, Sara Babakniya, Alex Bie, Weiwei Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- When Models Don't Collapse: On the Consistency of Iterative MLEDaniel Barzilai, Ohad ShamirNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Model Collapse Is Not a Bug but a Feature in Machine Unlearning for LLMsYan Scholten, Sophie Xhonneux, Leo Schwinn, Stephan GünnemannICLR 2026 · 8 citations
Builds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image GenerationAditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray et al.ICML 2021 · 6,356 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own DataQuentin Bertrand, Avishek Joey Bose, Alexandre Duplessis, Marco Jiralerspong et al.ICLR 2024 · 93 citations
- Self-Consuming Generative Models with Adversarially Curated DataXiukun Wei, Xueru ZhangICML 2025
- Human Learning by Model Feedback: The Dynamics of Iterative Prompting with MidjourneyShachar Don-Yehiya, Leshem Choshen, Omri AbendEMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
- Curated Synthetic Data Doesn’t Have to Collapse: A Theoretical Study of Generative Retraining with Pluralistic PreferencesAli Falahati, Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri, Kate Larson, Lukasz GolabICML 2026
- Self-Supervised Direct Preference Optimization for Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsLiang Peng, Boxi Wu, Haoran Cheng, Yibo Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
