MirageFlow: A New Bandwidth Inflation Attack on Tor
Christoph Sendner, Jasper Stang, Alexandra Dmitrienko, Raveen Wijewickrama, Murtuza Jadliwala
Abstract
—The Tor network is the most prominent system for providing anonymous communication to web users, with a daily user base of 2 million users. However, since its inception, it has been constantly targeted by various traffic fingerprinting and correlation attacks aiming at deanonymizing its users. A critical requirement for these attacks is to attract as much user traffic to adversarial relays as possible, which is typically accomplished by means of bandwidth inflation attacks. This paper proposes a new inflation attack vector in Tor, referred to as MirageFlow, which enables inflation of measured bandwidth. The underlying attack technique exploits resource sharing among Tor relay nodes and employs a cluster of attacker-controlled relays with coordinated resource allocation within the cluster to deceive bandwidth measurers into believing that each relay node in the cluster possesses ample resources. We propose two attack variants, C-MirageFlow and D-MirageFlow, and test both versions in a private Tor test network. Our evaluation demonstrates that an attacker can inflate the measured bandwidth by a factor close to n using C-MirageFlow and nearly half n ∗ N using D-MirageFlow, where n is the size of the cluster hosted on one server and N is the number of servers. Furthermore, our theoretical analysis reveals that gaining control over half of the Tor network’s traffic can be achieved by employing just 10 dedicated servers with a cluster size of 109 relays running the MirageFlow attack, each with a bandwidth of 100MB/s. The problem is further exacerbated by the fact that Tor not only allows resource sharing but, according to recent reports, even promotes it.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4580b011-0be4-4956-ad23-c96c5faf2fe2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep LearningPayap Sirinam, Mohsen Imani, Marc Juarez, Matthew WrightCCS 2018 · 632 citations
- Website Fingerprinting at Internet ScaleAndriy Panchenko, Fabian Lanze, Jan Pennekamp, Thomas Engel et al.NDSS 2016 · 625 citations
- k-fingerprinting: A Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting TechniqueJamie Hayes, George DanezisUSENIX Security 2016 · 474 citations
- Automated Website Fingerprinting through Deep LearningVera Rimmer, Davy Preuveneers, Marc Juarez, Tom van Goethem et al.NDSS 2018 · 399 citations
- DeepCorr: Strong Flow Correlation Attacks on Tor Using Deep LearningMilad Nasr, Alireza Bahramali, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 187 citations
Related papers
- Point Break: A Study of Bandwidth Denial-of-Service Attacks against TorRob Jansen, Tavish Vaidya, Micah SherrUSENIX Security 2019 · 49 citations
- Descriptors of Exposure: Undermining Tor Anonymity Through Exploiting Descriptor FloodChunmian Wang, Junzhou Luo, Zhen Ling, Yue Zhang et al.S&P 2026
- Flow Correlation Attacks on Tor Onion Service Sessions with Sliding Subset SumDaniela Lopes, Jin-Dong Dong, Pedro Medeiros, Daniel Castro et al.NDSS 2024
- Duplicate-Node Attack: Identifying Guards to Degrade and Triangulate Onion ServicesChunmian Wang, Xiaodan Gu, Ming Yang, Qi Chen et al.INFOCOM 2026
- MUFFLER: Secure Tor Traffic Obfuscation with Dynamic Connection Shuffling and SplittingMinjae Seo, Myoungsung You, Jaehan Kim, Taejune Park et al.INFOCOM 2025
