Purifier: Defending Data Inference Attacks via Transforming Confidence Scores
Ziqi Yang, Lijin Wang, Da Yang, Jie Wan, Ziming Zhao, Ee-Chien Chang, Fan Zhang, Kui Ren
Abstract
Neural networks are susceptible to data inference attacks such as the membership inference attack, the adversarial model inversion attack and the attribute inference attack, where the attacker could infer useful information such as the membership, the reconstruction or the sensitive attributes of a data sample from the confidence scores predicted by the target classifier. In this paper, we propose a method, namely PURIFIER, to defend against membership inference attacks. It transforms the confidence score vectors predicted by the target classifier and makes purified confidence scores indistinguishable in individual shape, statistical distribution and prediction label between members and non-members. The experimental results show that PURIFIER helps defend membership inference attacks with high effectiveness and efficiency, outperforming previous defense methods, and also incurs negligible utility loss. Besides, our further experiments show that PURIFIER is also effective in defending adversarial model inversion attacks and attribute inference attacks. For example, the inversion error is raised about 4+ times on the Facescrub530 classifier, and the attribute inference accuracy drops significantly when PURIFIER is deployed in our experiment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- SoK: Unintended Interactions among Machine Learning Defenses and RisksVasisht Duddu, Sebastian Szyller, N. AsokanS&P 2024 · 6 citations
- Stealthy Shield Defense: A Conditional Mutual Information-Based Approach against Black-Box Model Inversion AttacksTianqu Zhuang, Hongyao Yu, Yixiang Qiu, Hao Fang et al.ICLR 2025
- Theoretical Insights in Model Inversion Robustness and Conditional Entropy Maximization for Collaborative Inference SystemsSong Xia, Yi Yu, Wenhan Yang, Meiwen Ding et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on18
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Yupeng ZhangS&P 2017 · 2,107 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
Related papers
- MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial ExamplesJinyuan Jia, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.CCS 2019 · 464 citations
- Diffence: Fencing Membership Privacy With Diffusion ModelsYuefeng Peng, Ali Naseh, Amir HoumansadrNDSS 2025
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
- Defending Privacy Against More Knowledgeable Membership Inference AttackersYu Yin, Ke Chen, Lidan Shou, Gang ChenKDD 2021 · 12 citations
- Membership Leakage in Label-Only ExposuresZheng Li, Yang ZhangCCS 2021 · 185 citations
