Faithful and Efficient Explanations for Neural Networks via Neural Tangent Kernel Surrogate Models
Andrew Engel, Zhichao Wang, Natalie Frank, Ioana Dumitriu, Sutanay Choudhury, Anand D. Sarwate, Tony Chiang
Abstract
A recent trend in explainable AI research has focused on surrogate modeling, where neural networks are approximated as simpler ML algorithms such as kernel machines. A second trend has been to utilize kernel functions in various explain-by-example or data attribution tasks. In this work, we combine these two trends to analyze approximate empirical neural tangent kernels (eNTK) for data attribution. Approximation is critical for eNTK analysis due to the high computational cost to compute the eNTK. We define new approximate eNTK and perform novel analysis on how well the resulting kernel machine surrogate models correlate with the underlying neural network. We introduce two new random projection variants of approximate eNTK which allow users to tune the time and memory complexity of their calculation. We conclude that kernel machines using approximate neural tangent kernel as the kernel function are effective surrogate models, with the introduced trace NTK the most consistent performer. Open source software allowing users to efficiently calculate kernel functions in the PyTorch framework is available (https://github.com/pnnl/projection\_ntk).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 455976bf-1c5c-442b-b957-71fa73a0ebfeCited by top-tier papers4
- Finite-Width Neural Tangent Kernels from Feynman DiagramsMax Guillen, Philipp Misof, Jan GerkenICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Equivariant Neural Tangent KernelsPhilipp Misof, Pan Kessel, Jan E. GerkenICML 2025
- Eigen Analysis of Conjugate Kernel and Neural Tangent KernelXiangchao Li, Xiao Han, Qing YangICML 2025
- Interpretable Self-Supervised Learning via Representer Landmarks and Nyström ApproximationMaedeh Zarvandi, Michael Timothy, Theresa Wasserer, Debarghya GhoshdastidarICML 2026
Builds on17
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data AugmentationsXiangning Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Boqing GongICLR 2022 · 388 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural NetworksGreg Yang, Edward J. HuICML 2021 · 242 citations
- Neural Networks as Kernel Learners: The Silent Alignment EffectAlexander B. Atanasov, Blake Bordelon, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2022 · 110 citations
Related papers
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
- A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent KernelMohamad Amin Mohamadi, Wonho Bae, Danica J. SutherlandICML 2023 · 34 citations
- Fast Finite Width Neural Tangent KernelRoman Novak, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Samuel S. SchoenholzICML 2022 · 72 citations
- Scaling Neural Tangent Kernels via Sketching and Random FeaturesAmir Zandieh, Insu Han, Haim Avron, Neta Shoham et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 42 citations
- A generalized neural tangent kernel for surrogate gradient learningLuke Eilers, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Sven GoedekeNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
