Review of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments
Emeline Brulé, Brianna J. Tomlinson, Oussama Metatla, Christophe Jouffrais, Marcos Serrano
Abstract
Addressing the needs of visually impaired people is of continued interest in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) research. Yet, one of the major challenges facing researchers in this field continues to be how to design adequate quantitative empirical evaluation for these users in HCI. In this paper, we analyse a corpus of 178 papers on technologies designed for people with visual impairments, published since 1988, and including at least one quantitative empirical evaluation (243 evaluations in total). To inform future research in this area, we provide an overview, historic trends and a unified terminology to design and report quantitative empirical evaluations. We identify open issues and propose a set of guidelines to address them. Our analysis aims to facilitate and stimulate future research on this topic.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 44e40eaf-d7b8-4139-a4b4-c7772b7ff8d4Cited by top-tier papers9
- What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 323 citations
- Technology Developments in Touch-Based Accessible Graphics: A Systematic Review of Research 2010-2020Matthew Butler, Leona M. Holloway, Samuel Reinders, Cagatay Goncu et al.CHI 2021 · 74 citations
- Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of ReviewsEvropi Stefanidi, Marit Bentvelzen, Pawel W. Wozniak, Thomas Kosch et al.CHI 2023 · 61 citations
- Revamp: Enhancing Accessible Information Seeking Experience of Online Shopping for Blind or Low Vision UsersRuolin Wang, Zixuan Chen, Mingrui Ray Zhang, Zhaoheng Li et al.CHI 2021 · 37 citations
- Towards Robotic Companions: Understanding Handler-Guide Dog Interactions for Informed Guide Dog Robot DesignHochul Hwang, Hee-Tae Jung, Nicholas A. Giudice, Joydeep Biswas et al.CHI 2024 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
- Who Are You Asking?: Qualitative Methods for Involving AAC Users as Primary Research ParticipantsErin BeneteauCHI 2020 · 28 citations
- Human Robot Interaction for Blind and Low Vision People: A Systematic Literature ReviewYize Wei, Nathan Rocher, Chitralekha Gupta, Mia Huong Nguyen et al.CHI 2025 · 7 citations
- Bridging the Gap between Automated Intervention and Actual User Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study on Mobile Accessibility Issues for Screen Reader UsersSyed Fatiul Huq, Ziyao He, Yirui He, Sam MalekCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
