Enabling Your Forensic Detector Know How Well It Performs on Distorted Samples
Bin Li, Haoyu Li, Haodong Li, Jiaming Zhong, Changsheng Chen, Jiangqun Ni, Bo Cao
Abstract
Generative AI has substantially facilitated realistic image synthesizing, posing great challenges for reliable forensics. When image forensic detectors are deployed in the wild, the inputs usually undergone various distortions including compression, rescaling, and lossy transmission. Such distortions severely erode forensic traces and make a detector fail silently—returning an over-confident binary prediction while being incapable of making reliable decision, as the detector cannot explicitly perceive the degree of data distortion. This paper argues that reliable forensics must therefore move beyond "is the image real or fake?" to also ask "how trustworthy is the detector's decision on the image?" We formulate this requirement as Detector's Distortion-Aware Confidence (DAC): a sample-level confidence that a given detector could properly handle the input. Taking AI-generated image detection as an example, we empirically discover that detection accuracy drops almost monotonically with full-reference image quality scores as distortion becomes severer, while such references are in fact unavailable at test time. Guided by this observation, the Distortion-Aware Confidence Model (DACOM) is proposed as a useful assistant to the forensic detector. DACOM utilizes full-reference image quality assessment to provide oracle statistical information that labels the detectability of images for training, and integrates intermediate forensic features of the detector, no-reference image quality descriptors and distortion-type cues to estimate DAC. With the estimated confidence score, it is possible to conduct selective abstention and multi-detector routing to improve the overall accuracy of a detection system. Extensive experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
- DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image DetectionZhendong Wang, Jianmin Bao, Wengang Zhou, Weilun Wang et al.ICCV 2023 · 479 citations
- Frequency-Aware Deepfake Detection: Improving Generalizability through Frequency Space Domain LearningChuangchuang Tan, Yao Zhao, Shikui Wei, Guanghua Gu et al.AAAI 2024 · 232 citations
- Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-Based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake DetectionChuangchuang Tan, Huan Liu, Yao Zhao, Shikui Wei et al.CVPR 2024 · 126 citations
Related papers
- Dissect and Prune: Enhancing Robustness in AI-Generated Image DetectionDahye Kim, Jaehyun Choi, Hyun Seok Seong, Seongho Kim et al.ICML 2026
- Enabling Supervised Learning of Generative Signatures for Generalized Synthetic Image DetectionJianwei Fei, Yunshu Dai, Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhihua Xia et al.CVPR 2026
- Seeing What Matters: Generalizable AI-generated Video Detection with Forensic-Oriented AugmentationRiccardo Corvi, Davide Cozzolino, Ekta Prashnani, Shalini De Mello et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- Diversity over Uniformity: Rethinking Representation in Generated Image DetectionQinghui He, Haifeng Zhang, Qiao Qin, Bo Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- D3QE: Learning Discrete Distribution Discrepancy-Aware Quantization Error for Autoregressive-Generated Image DetectionYanran Zhang, Bingyao Yu, Yu Zheng, Wenzhao Zheng et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
