GROOT: Effective Design of Biological Sequences with Limited Experimental Data
Thanh V. T. Tran, Nhat Khang Ngo, Viet Anh Nguyen, Truong Son Hy
Abstract
Latent space optimization (LSO) is a powerful method for designing discrete, high-dimensional biological sequences that maximize expensive black-box functions, such as wet lab experiments. This is accomplished by learning a latent space from available data and using a surrogate model 𝑓 Φ to guide optimization algorithms toward optimal outputs. However, existing methods struggle when labeled data is limited, as training 𝑓 Φ with few labeled data points can lead to subpar outputs, offering no advantage over the training data itself. We address this challenge by introducing GROOT , a GRaph-based Latent SmOOThing for Biological Sequence Optimization. In particular, GROOT generates pseudo-labels for neighbors sampled around the training latent embeddings. These pseudolabels are then refined and smoothed by Label Propagation. Additionally, we theoretically and empirically justify our approach, demonstrate GROOT's ability to extrapolate to regions beyond the training set while maintaining reliability within an upper bound of their expected distances from the training regions. We evaluate GROOT on various biological sequence design tasks, including protein optimization (GFP and AAV) and three tasks with exact oracles from Design-Bench. The results demonstrate that GROOT equalizes and surpasses existing methods without requiring access to black-box oracles or vast amounts of labeled data, highlighting its practicality and effectiveness. We release our code at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GROOT-D554.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 44288300-e368-47a4-b95a-9132168b06d2Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models out-performs Graph Neural NetworksQian Huang, Horace He, Abhay Singh, Ser-Nam Lim et al.ICLR 2021 · 322 citations
- Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNetsMoksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio, Alex Hernández-García, Jarrid Rector-Brooks et al.ICML 2022 · 224 citations
- Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising AutoencodersSamuel Stanton, Wesley J. Maddox, Nate Gruver, Phillip M. Maffettone et al.ICML 2022 · 137 citations
Related papers
- A Variational Perspective on Generative Protein Fitness OptimizationLea Bogensperger, Dominik Narnhofer, Ahmed Allam, Konrad Schindler et al.ICML 2025
- Importance Weighted Expectation-Maximization for Protein Sequence DesignZhenqiao Song, Lei LiICML 2023 · 19 citations
- Bootstrapped Training of Score-Conditioned Generator for Offline Design of Biological SequencesMinsu Kim, Federico Berto, Sungsoo Ahn, Jinkyoo ParkNeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
- Robust Optimization in Protein Fitness Landscapes Using Reinforcement Learning in Latent SpaceMinji Lee, Luiz Felipe Vecchietti, Hyunkyu Jung, Hyun Joo Ro et al.ICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Mitigating over-Exploration in Latent Space Optimization using lesOmer Ronen, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Richard G. Baraniuk, Randall Balestriero et al.ICML 2025
