ACT as Human: Multimodal Large Language Model Data Annotation with Critical Thinking
Lequan Lin, Dai Shi, Andi Han, Feng Chen, Qiuzheng Chen, Jiawen Li, Zhaoyang Li, Jiyuan Zhang, Zhenbang Sun, Junbin Gao
Abstract
Supervised learning relies on high-quality labeled data, but obtaining such data through human annotation is both expensive and time-consuming. Recent work explores using large language models (LLMs) for annotation, but LLM-generated labels still fall short of human-level quality. To address this problem, we propose the Annotation with Critical Thinking (ACT) data pipeline, where LLMs serve not only as annotators but also as judges to critically identify potential errors. Human effort is then directed towards reviewing only the most "suspicious" cases, significantly improving the human annotation efficiency. Our major contributions are as follows: (1) ACT is applicable to a wide range of domains, including natural language processing (NLP), computer vision (CV), and multimodal understanding, by leveraging multimodal-LLMs (MLLMs). (2) Through empirical studies, we derive 7 insights on how to enhance annotation quality while efficiently reducing the human cost, and then translate these findings into user-friendly guidelines. (3) We theoretically analyze how to modify the loss function so that models trained on ACT data achieve similar performance to those trained on fully human-annotated data. Our experiments show that the performance gap can be reduced to less than 2% on most benchmark datasets while saving up to 90% of human costs.
The work is done during Lequan Lin's internship at ByteDance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4421320f-e886-4096-b40a-f44b4923df1cBuilds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationTianqi Liu, Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman et al.ICLR 2024 · 346 citations
Related papers
- Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation Through Effective Verification of LLM LabelsXinru Wang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Kushan Mitra et al.CHI 2024 · 127 citations
- Label Annotation for Tabular Anomaly Detection with Large Language ModelsHaihong Zhao, Aochuan Chen, Miao Peng, Xiaolong Fan et al.KDD 2026
- Next Generation Active Learning: Mixture of LLMs in the LoopYuanyuan Qi, Xiaohao Yang, Jueqing Lu, Guoxiang Guo et al.AAAI 2026
- LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingJiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations
- Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model PerformanceOmer Nahum, Nitay Calderon, Orgad Keller, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
