Convex Calibrated Surrogates for the Multi-Label F-Measure
Mingyuan Zhang, Harish Guruprasad Ramaswamy, Shivani Agarwal
Abstract
The F -measure is a widely used performance measure for multi-label classification, where multiple labels can be active in an instance simultaneously (e.g. in image tagging, multiple tags can be active in any image). In particular, the F -measure explicitly balances recall (fraction of active labels predicted to be active) and precision (fraction of labels predicted to be active that are actually so), both of which are important in evaluating the overall performance of a multi-label classifier. As with most discrete prediction problems, however, directly optimizing the F -measure is computationally hard. In this paper, we explore the question of designing convex surrogate losses that are calibrated for the F -measure -specifically, that have the property that minimizing the surrogate loss yields (in the limit of sufficient data) a Bayes optimal multi-label classifier for the F -measure. We show that the F -measure for an s-label problem, when viewed as a 2 s × 2 s loss matrix, has rank at most s 2 + 1, and apply a result of Ramaswamy et al. (2014) to design a family of convex calibrated surrogates for the F -measure. The resulting surrogate risk minimization algorithms can be viewed as decomposing the multi-label F -measure learning problem into s 2 + 1 binary class probability estimation problems. We also provide a quantitative regret transfer bound for our surrogates, which allows any regret guarantees for the binary problems to be transferred to regret guarantees for the overall F -measure problem, and discuss a connection with the algorithm of Dembczynski et al. (2013) . Our experiments confirm our theoretical findings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 441ae52e-ae68-470a-91ad-85b0e41d635eCited by top-tier papers15
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and ApplicationsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2023 · 790 citations
- Multi-Class -Consistency BoundsPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- Generalizing Consistent Multi-Class Classification with Rejection to be Compatible with Arbitrary LossesYuzhou Cao, Tianchi Cai, Lei Feng, Lihong Gu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 42 citations
- In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to DeferYuzhou Cao, Hussein Mozannar, Lei Feng, Hongxin Wei et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 36 citations
- H-Consistency Bounds: Characterization and ExtensionsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Towards Decision-Friendly AUC: Learning Multi-Classifier with AUCµPeifeng Gao, Qianqian Xu, Peisong Wen, Huiyang Shao et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Bayes Consistency vs. H-Consistency: The Interplay between Surrogate Loss Functions and the Scoring Function ClassMingyuan Zhang, Shivani AgarwalNeurIPS 2020 · 42 citations
- Multi-label classification: do Hamming loss and subset accuracy really conflict with each other?Guoqiang Wu, Jun ZhuNeurIPS 2020 · 44 citations
- Multi-Label Learning with Stronger Consistency GuaranteesAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
- Regret Bounds for Multilabel Classification in Sparse Label RegimesRóbert Busa-Fekete, Heejin Choi, Krzysztof Dembczynski, Claudio Gentile et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
