GuideBench: Benchmarking Domain-Oriented Guideline Following for LLM Agents
Lingxiao Diao, Xinyue Xu, Wanxuan Sun, Cheng Yang, Zhuosheng Zhang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely deployed as autonomous agents capable of following user instructions and making decisions in real-world applications. Previous studies have made notable progress in benchmarking the instruction following capabilities of LLMs in general domains, with a primary focus on their inherent commonsense knowledge. Recently, LLMs have been increasingly deployed as domain-oriented agents, which rely on domain-oriented guidelines that may conflict with their commonsense knowledge. These guidelines exhibit two key characteristics: they consist of a wide range of domain-oriented rules and are subject to frequent updates. Despite these challenges, the absence of comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating the domain-oriented guideline following capabilities of LLMs presents a significant obstacle to their effective assessment and further development. In this paper, we introduce GUIDEBENCH, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate guideline following performance of LLMs. GUIDEBENCH evaluates LLMs on three critical aspects: (i) adherence to diverse rules, (ii) robustness to rule updates, and (iii) alignment with human preferences. Experimental results on a range of LLMs indicate substantial opportunities for improving their ability to follow domain-oriented guidelines. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Dlxxx/GuideBench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 440cf3f3-f8c7-4df6-9a20-998b013cd795Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject StudiesGati V. Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, Adam Tauman KalaiICML 2023 · 651 citations
- Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge ConflictsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Renze Lou et al.ICLR 2024 · 294 citations
- Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A SurveyRongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Zhijiang Guo, Cunxiang Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 38 citations
- FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Xingshan Zeng, Wanjun Zhong et al.ACL 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMsTao Zhang, Chenglin Zhu, Yanjun Shen, Wenjing Luo et al.ACL 2025 · 53 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- SysBench: Can LLMs Follow System Message?Yanzhao Qin, Tao Zhang, Tao Zhang, Yanjun Shen et al.ICLR 2025
- WebCoderBench: Benchmarking Web Application Generation with Comprehensive and Interpretable Evaluation MetricsChenxu Liu, Yingjie Fu, Wei Yang, Ying Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
- AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World ContextsKeyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
