Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learning
Sungwon Han, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Ö. Arik, Tomas Pfister
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), with their remarkable ability to tackle challenging and unseen reasoning problems, hold immense potential for tabular learning, that is vital for many real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a novel in-context learning framework, FeatLLM, which employs LLMs as feature engineers to produce an input data set that is optimally suited for tabular predictions. The generated features are used to infer class likelihood with a simple downstream machine learning model, such as linear regression and yields high performance few-shot learning. The proposed FeatLLM framework only uses this simple predictive model with the discovered features at inference time. Compared to existing LLM-based approaches, FeatLLM eliminates the need to send queries to the LLM for each sample at inference time. Moreover, it merely requires API-level access to LLMs, and overcomes prompt size limitations. As demonstrated across numerous tabular datasets from a wide range of domains, FeatLLM generates high-quality rules, significantly (10% on average) outperforming alternatives such as TabLLM and STUNT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 43f09ac1-3483-4179-b3ff-38c256df6a3fCited by top-tier papers19
- TabDPT: Scaling Tabular Foundation Models on Real DataJunwei Ma, Valentin Thomas, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Alex Labach et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 118 citations
- A Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its CapabilitiesHan-Jia Ye, Si-Yang Liu, Wei-Lun ChaoNeurIPS 2025 · 52 citations
- LLM Meeting Decision Trees on Tabular DataHangting Ye, Jinmeng Li, He Zhao, Dandan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- No Need to Train Your RDB Foundation ModelLinjie Xu, Yanlin Zhang, Quan Gan, Minjie Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- HyperG: Hypergraph-Enhanced LLMs for Structured KnowledgeSirui Huang, Hanqian Li, Yanggan Gu, Xuming Hu et al.SIGIR 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
Related papers
- Optimized Feature Generation for Tabular Data via LLMs with Decision Tree ReasoningJaehyun Nam, Kyuyoung Kim, Seunghyuk Oh, Jihoon Tack et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 78 citations
- Language Models are Weak LearnersHariharan Manikandan, Yiding Jiang, J. Zico KolterNeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
- Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature EngineeringNoah Hollmann, Samuel Müller, Frank HutterNeurIPS 2023 · 210 citations
- From Supervised to Generative: A Novel Paradigm for Tabular Deep Learning with Large Language ModelsXumeng Wen, Han Zhang, Shun Zheng, Wei Xu et al.KDD 2024 · 9 citations
- Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table UnderstandingZilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos et al.ICLR 2024 · 244 citations
