Outlier Weighed Layerwise Sparsity (OWL): A Missing Secret Sauce for Pruning LLMs to High Sparsity
Lu Yin, You Wu, Zhenyu Zhang, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Yaqing Wang, Yiling Jia, Gen Li, Ajay Kumar Jaiswal, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Yi Liang, Michael Bendersky, Zhangyang Wang, Shiwei Liu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), renowned for their remarkable performance across diverse domains, present a challenge when it comes to practical deployment due to their colossal model size. In response to this challenge, efforts have been directed toward the application of traditional network pruning techniques to LLMs, uncovering a massive number of parameters that can be pruned in one-shot without hurting performance. Prevailing LLM pruning strategies have consistently adhered to the practice of uniformly pruning all layers at equivalent sparsity, resulting in robust performance. However, this observation stands in contrast to the prevailing trends observed in the field of vision models, where non-uniform layerwise sparsity typically yields stronger results. To understand the underlying reasons for this disparity, we conduct a comprehensive study and discover a strong correlation with the emergence of activation outliers in LLMs. Inspired by this finding, we introduce a novel LLM pruning methodology that incorporates a tailored set of non-uniform layerwise sparsity ratios, termed as Outlier Weighed Layerwise sparsity (OWL). The sparsity ratio of OWL is proportional to the outlier ratio observed within each layer, facilitating a more effective alignment between layerwise weight sparsity and outlier ratios. Our empirical evaluation, conducted across the LLaMA-V1 family and OPT, spanning various benchmarks, demonstrates the distinct advantages offered by OWL over previous methods. For instance, OWL exhibits a remarkable performance gain, surpassing the state-of-the-art Wanda and SparseGPT by 61.22 and 6.80 perplexity at a high sparsity level of 70%, respectively, while delivering 2.6x end-to-end inference speed-up in the DeepSparse inference engine. Codes are available at https://github.com/luuyin/OWL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 43e2b816-8c2d-4e73-a291-77a22965b1d1Cited by top-tier papers86
- H2O: Heavy-Hitter Oracle for Efficient Generative Inference of Large Language ModelsZhenyu Zhang, Ying Sheng, Tianyi Zhou, Tianlong Chen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,003 citations
- Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via Plug-and-Play Positional EncodingZhenyu Zhang, Runjin Chen, Shiwei Liu, Zhewei Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- MaskLLM: Learnable Semi-Structured Sparsity for Large Language ModelsGongfan Fang, Hongxu Yin, Saurav Muralidharan, Greg Heinrich et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 72 citations
- CaM: Cache Merging for Memory-efficient LLMs InferenceYuxin Zhang, Yuxuan Du, Gen Luo, Yunshan Zhong et al.ICML 2024 · 66 citations
- Pruner-Zero: Evolving Symbolic Pruning Metric From Scratch for Large Language ModelsPeijie Dong, Lujun Li, Zhenheng Tang, Xiang Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 64 citations
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- Automatic Pruning Discovery for Large Language ModelsHaidong Kang, Lihong Lin, Enneng Yang, Hong-Ning Dai et al.ICML 2026
- LSA: Layer-wise Sparsity Allocation for Large Language Model Pruning Based on Minimal Linear Reconstruction ErrorZhiguo Yang, Changjian Deng, Qinke Chen, Zijing Zhou et al.ICLR 2026
- Adaptive Layer Sparsity for Large Language Models via Activation Correlation AssessmentWei Li, Lujun Li, Mark G. Lee, Shengjie SunNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- DLP: Dynamic Layerwise Pruning in Large Language ModelsYuli Chen, Bo Cheng, Jiale Han, Yingying Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- Dual-Assessment Driven Pruning: Iterative Optimizing Layer-wise Sparsity for Large Language ModelQinghui Sun, Weilun Wang, Yanni Zhu, Shenghuan He et al.KDD 2024 · 3 citations
