On Error Propagation of Diffusion Models
Yangming Li, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Although diffusion models (DMs) have shown promising performances in a number of tasks (e.g., speech synthesis and image generation), they might suffer from error propagation because of their sequential structure. However, this is not certain because some sequential models, such as Conditional Random Field (CRF), are free from this problem. To address this issue, we develop a theoretical framework to mathematically formulate error propagation in the architecture of DMs, The framework contains three elements, including modular error, cumulative error, and propagation equation. The modular and cumulative errors are related by the equation, which interprets that DMs are indeed affected by error propagation. Our theoretical study also suggests that the cumulative error is closely related to the generation quality of DMs. Based on this finding, we apply the cumulative error as a regularization term to reduce error propagation. Because the term is computationally intractable, we derive its upper bound and design a bootstrap algorithm to efficiently estimate the bound for optimization. We have conducted extensive experiments on multiple image datasets, showing that our proposed regularization reduces error propagation, significantly improves vanilla DMs, and outperforms previous baselines. INTRODUCTION DMs potentially suffer from error propagation. While diffusion models (DMs) have shown impressive performances in a number of tasks (e.g., image synthesis (Rombach et al., 2022) , speech processing (Kong et al., 2021) and natural language generation (Li et al., 2022)), they might still suffer from error propagation (Motter & Lai, 2002) , a classical problem in engineering practices (e.g., communication networks) (Fu et al., 2020; Motter & Lai, 2002; Crucitti et al., 2004) . The problem mainly affects some chain models that consist of many end-to-end connected modules. For those models, the output error from one module will spread to subsequent modules such that errors accumulate along the chain. Since DMs are exactly of a chain structure and have a large number of modules (e.g., 1000 for DDPM (Ho et al., 2020) ), the effect of error propagation on diffusion models is potentially notable and worth a careful study. Current works lack reliable explanations. Some recent works (Ning et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Daras et al., 2023) have noticed this problem and named it as exposure bias or sampling drift. However, those works claim that error propagation happens to DMs simply because the models are of a cascade structure. In fact, many sequential models (e.g., CRF (Lafferty et al., 2001) and CTC (Graves et al., 2006)) are free from the problem. Therefore, a solid explanation is expected to answer whether(or even why) error propagation impacts on DMs. Our theory for the error propagation of DMs. One main focus of this work is to develop a theoretical framework for analyzing the error propagation of DMs. With this framework, we can clearly understand how this problem is mathematically formulated in the architecture of DMs and easily see whether it has a significant impact on the models. Our framework contains three elements: modular error, cumulative error, and propagation equation. The first two elements respectively measure the prediction error of one single module and the accumulated error of multiple modules, while the last one tells how these errors are related. We
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers14
- Elucidating the Exposure Bias in Diffusion ModelsMang Ning, Mingxiao Li, Jianlin Su, Albert Ali Salah et al.ICLR 2024 · 95 citations
- On Efficiency-Effectiveness Trade-off of Diffusion-based RecommendersWenyu Mao, Jiancan Wu, Guoqing Hu, Zhengyi Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Autoregressive Visual Decoding from EEG SignalsSicheng Dai, Hongwang Xiao, Shan Yu, Qiwei YeICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Elucidating the SNR-t Bias of Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsMeng Yu, Lei Sun, Jianhao Zeng, Xiangxiang Chu et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Q&C: When Quantization Meets Cache in Efficient GenerationXin Ding, Xin Li, Haotong Qin, Zhibo ChenICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on13
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- DiffWave: A Versatile Diffusion Model for Audio SynthesisZhifeng Kong, Wei Ping, Jiaji Huang, Kexin Zhao et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,902 citations
Related papers
- Error Propagation Mechanisms and Compensation Strategies for Quantized Diffusion ModelsSongwei Liu, Chao Zeng, Chenqian Yan, Xurui Peng et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Input Perturbation Reduces Exposure Bias in Diffusion ModelsMang Ning, Enver Sangineto, Angelo Porrello, Simone Calderara et al.ICML 2023 · 100 citations
- Multi-Step Denoising Scheduled Sampling: Towards Alleviating Exposure Bias for Diffusion ModelsZhiyao Ren, Yibing Zhan, Liang Ding, Gaoang Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 15 citations
- Plug-and-Play Fidelity Optimization for Diffusion Transformer Acceleration via Cumulative Error MinimizationTong Shao, Yusen Fu, Guoying Sun, Jingde Kong et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Optimizing Quantized Diffusion Models via Distillation with Cross-Timestep Error CorrectionYanxi Li, Chengbin DuAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
