PCSPOOF: Compromising the Safety of Time-Triggered Ethernet
Andrew D. Loveless, Linh Thi Xuan Phan, Ronald G. Dreslinski, Baris Kasikci
Abstract
Designers are increasingly using mixed-criticality networks in embedded systems to reduce size, weight, power, and cost. Perhaps the most successful of these technologies is Time-Triggered Ethernet (TTE), which lets critical time-triggered (TT) traffic and non-critical best-effort (BE) traffic share the same switches and cabling. A key aspect of TTE is that the TT part of the system is isolated from the BE part, and thus BE devices have no way to disrupt the operation of the TTE devices. This isolation allows designers to: (1) use untrusted, but low cost, BE hardware, (2) lower BE security requirements, and (3) ignore BE devices during safety reviews and certification procedures.We present PCSPOOF, the first attack to break TTE’s isolation guarantees. PCSPOOF is based on two key observations. First, it is possible for a BE device to infer private information about the TT part of the network that can be used to craft malicious synchronization messages. Second, by injecting electrical noise into a TTE switch over an Ethernet cable, a BE device can trick the switch into sending these malicious synchronization messages to other TTE devices. Our evaluation shows that successful attacks are possible in seconds, and that each successful attack can cause TTE devices to lose synchronization for up to a second and drop tens of TT messages — both of which can result in the failure of critical systems like aircraft or automobiles. We also show that, in a simulated spaceflight mission, PCSPOOF causes uncontrolled maneuvers that threaten safety and mission success. We disclosed PCSPOOF to aerospace companies using TTE, and several are implementing mitigations from this paper.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Fault Tolerance in Time-Sensitive Networking with Mixed-Critical TrafficWenhong Ma, Xiangzhen Xiao, Guoqi Xie, Nan Guan et al.DAC 2023 · 15 citations
- EdgeTDC: On the Security of Time Difference of Arrival Measurements in CAN Bus SystemsMarc Roeschlin, Giovanni Camurati, Pascal Brunner, Mridula Singh et al.NDSS 2023
- O-TSN: Enabling Oblivious Traffic Switch for Time-Sensitive NetworkingBo Zhang, Helei Cui, Cong Wang, Xingliang Yuan et al.INFOCOM 2026
- ATTEQ-NN: Attention-based QoE-aware Evasive Backdoor AttacksXueluan Gong, Yanjiao Chen, Jianshuo Dong, Qian WangNDSS 2022
- TEMPEST-LoRa: Cross-Technology Covert CommunicationXieyang Sun, Yuanqing Zheng, Wei Xi, Zuhao Chen et al.CCS 2025 · 2 citations
