Effective Processor Verification with Logic Fuzzer Enhanced Co-simulation
Nursultan Kabylkas, Tommy Thorn, Shreesha Srinath, Polychronis Xekalakis, Jose Renau
Abstract
The study on verification trends in the semiconductor industry shows that the design complexity is increasing, fewer companies achieve first silicon success and need more spins before production, companies hire more verification engineers, and 53% of the whole hardware-design-cycle is spent on the design verification [18]. The cost of the respin is high, and more than 40% of the cases that contribute to it are post-fabrication functional bug exposures [16]. The study also shows that 65% of verification engineers' time is spent on debug, test creation, and simulation [17]. This paper presents a set of tools for RISC-V processor verification engineers that help to expose more bugs before production and increase the productivity of time spent on debugging, test creation and simulation. We present Logic Fuzzer (LF), a novel tool that expands the verification space exploration without the creation of additional verification tests. The LF randomizes the states or control signals of the designunder-test at the places that do not affect functionality. It brings the processor execution outside its normal flow to increase the number of microarchitectural states exercised by the tests. We also present Dromajo, the state of the art processor verification framework for RISC-V cores. Dromajo is an RV64GC emulator that was designed specifically for co-simulation purposes. It can boot Linux, handle external stimuli, such as interrupts and debug requests on the fly, and can be integrated into existing testbench infrastructure with minimal effort. We evaluate the effectiveness of the tools on three RISC-V cores: CVA6, BlackParrot, and BOOM. Dromajo by itself found a total of nine bugs. The enhancement of Dromajo with the Logic Fuzzer increases the exposed bug count to thirteen without creating additional verification tests.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4371c24a-7440-4b17-99cd-e8a1ba14d67dCited by top-tier papers9
- Towards Developing High Performance RISC-V Processors Using Agile MethodologyYinan Xu, Zihao Yu, Dan Tang, Guokai Chen et al.MICRO 2022 · 108 citations
- Cascade: CPU Fuzzing via Intricate Program GenerationFlavien Solt, Katharina Ceesay-Seitz, Kaveh RazaviUSENIX Security 2024 · 46 citations
- μCFI: Formal Verification of Microarchitectural Control-flow IntegrityKatharina Ceesay-Seitz, Flavien Solt, Kaveh RazaviCCS 2024 · 3 citations
- AsFuzzer: Differential Testing of Assemblers with Error-Driven Grammar InferenceHyungseok Kim, Soomin Kim, Jungwoo Lee, Sang Kil ChaISSTA 2024 · 2 citations
- TurboFuzz: FPGA Accelerated Hardware Fuzzing for Processor Agile VerificationYang Zhong, Haoran Wu, Xueqi Li, Sa Wang et al.HPCA 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- MorFuzz: Fuzzing Processor via Runtime Instruction Morphing enhanced Synchronizable Co-simulationJinyan Xu, Yiyuan Liu, Sirui He, Haoran Lin et al.USENIX Security 2023
- HyPFuzz: Formal-Assisted Processor FuzzingChen Chen, Rahul Kande, Nathan Nguyen, Flemming Andersen et al.USENIX Security 2023
- DiffTest-H: Toward Semantic-Aware Communication in Hardware-Accelerated Processor VerificationKunlin You, Yinan Xu, Kehan Feng, Luoshan Cai et al.MICRO 2025 · 1 citation
- INSIGHT: Automatic Generation of Explanations for Efficient Identification of Hardware Bugs and UnderspecificationsVincent Quentin Ulitzsch, Alessandro Bertani, Peter W. Deutsch, David Langus Rodriguez et al.S&P 2026
- TheHuzz: Instruction Fuzzing of Processors Using Golden-Reference Models for Finding Software-Exploitable VulnerabilitiesRahul Kande, Addison Crump, Garrett Persyn, Patrick Jauernig et al.USENIX Security 2022
