Networked Information Aggregation via Machine Learning
Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth, Emily Ryu
Abstract
We study a distributed learning problem in which learning agents are embedded in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). There is a fixed and arbitrary distribution over feature/label pairs, and each agent or vertex in the graph is able to directly observe only a subset of the features — potentially a different subset for every agent. The agents learn sequentially in some order consistent with a topological sort of the DAG, committing to a model mapping observations to predictions of the real-valued label. Each agent observes the predictions of their parents in the DAG, and trains their model using both the features of the instance that they directly observe, and the predictions of their parents as additional features. We ask when this process is sufficient to achieve information aggregation, in the sense that some agent in the DAG is able to learn a model whose error is competitive with the best model that could have been learned (in some hypothesis class) with direct access to all features, despite the fact that no single agent in the network has such access. We give upper and lower bounds for this problem for both linear and general hypothesis classes. Our results identify the depth of the DAG as the key parameter: information aggregation can occur over sufficiently long paths in the DAG, assuming that all of the relevant features are well represented along the path, and there are distributions over which information aggregation cannot occur even in the linear case, and even in arbitrarily large DAGs that do not have sufficient depth (such as a hub-and-spokes topology in which the spoke vertices collectively see all the features). We complement our theoretical results with a comprehensive set of experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Multicalibration as Boosting for RegressionIra Globus-Harris, Declan Harrison, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth et al.ICML 2023 · 36 citations
- Tractable Agreement ProtocolsNatalie Collina, Surbhi Goel, Varun Gupta, Aaron RothSTOC 2025 · 10 citations
- How Global Calibration Strengthens MultiaccuracySílvia Casacuberta, Parikshit Gopalan, Varun Kanade, Omer ReingoldFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision MakingGeorgy Noarov, Ramya Ramalingam, Aaron Roth, Stephan XieICML 2025
- Collaborative Prediction: Tractable Information Aggregation via AgreementNatalie Collina, Ira Globus-Harris, Surbhi Goel, Varun Gupta et al.SODA 2026
Related papers
- Decentralised Learning with Random Features and Distributed Gradient DescentDominic Richards, Patrick Rebeschini, Lorenzo RosascoICML 2020 · 20 citations
- Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learningThijs Vogels, Hadrien Hendrikx, Martin JaggiNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- Federated Causality Learning with Explainable Adaptive OptimizationDezhi Yang, Xintong He, Jun Wang, Guoxian Yu et al.AAAI 2024 · 21 citations
- RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous DataThijs Vogels, Lie He, Anastasia Koloskova, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 78 citations
- Reinforcement Causal Structure Learning on Order GraphDezhi Yang, Guoxian Yu, Jun Wang, Zhengtian Wu et al.AAAI 2023 · 20 citations
