Lune

CVPR2022Top-tier venue

Neural Mean Discrepancy for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection

Xin Dong, Junfeng Guo, Ang Li, Wei-Te Ting, Cong Liu, H. T. Kung

2022Year
40Citations
22Top-tier citations

Abstract

Various approaches have been proposed for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection by augmenting models, input examples, training sets, and optimization objectives. Deviating from existing work, we have a simple hypothesis that standard off-the-shelf models may already contain sufficient information about the training set distribution which can be leveraged for reliable OOD detection. Our empirical study on validating this hypothesis, which measures the model activation's mean for OOD and in-distribution (ID) minibatches, surprisingly finds that activation means of OOD mini-batches consistently deviate more from those of the training data. In addition, training data's activation means can be computed offline efficiently or retrieved from batch normalization layers as a ‘free lunch’. Based upon this observation, we propose a novel metric called Neural Mean Discrepancy (NMD), which compares neural means of the input examples and training data. Leveraging the simplicity of NMD, we propose an efficient OOD detector that computes neural means by a standard forward pass followed by a lightweight classifier. Extensive experiments show that NMD outperforms state-of-the-art OOD approaches across multiple datasets and model architectures in terms of both detection accuracy and computational cost.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 42f60f73-edc6-49d8-931c-a3b5041fbf78

Cited by top-tier papers22

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on23

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines