Approximating the Distance to Monotonicity of Boolean Functions
Ramesh Krishnan S. Pallavoor, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Erik Waingarten
Abstract
We design a nonadaptive algorithm that, given a Boolean function f: 0, 1n → 0, 1 which is α-far from monotone, makes poly(n, 1/α) queries and returns an estimate that, with high probability, is an -approximation to the distance of f to monotonicity. Furthermore, we show that for any constant k > 0, approximating the distance to monotonicity up to n1/2−k-factor requires nonadaptive queries, thereby ruling out a poly(n, 1/α)-query nonadaptive algorithm for such approximations. This answers a question of Seshadhri (Property Testing Review, 2014) for the case of nonadaptive algorithms. Approximating the distance to a property is closely related to tolerantly testing that property. Our lower bound stands in contrast to standard (non-tolerant) testing of monotonicity that can be done nonadaptively with queries. We obtain our lower bound by proving an analogous bound for erasure-resilient testers. An α-erasure-resilient tester for a desired property gets oracle access to a function that has at most an α fraction of values erased. The tester has to accept (with probability at least 2/3) if the erasures can be filled in to ensure that the resulting function has the property and to reject (with probability at least 2/3) if every completion of erasures results in a function that is ε-far from having the property. Our method yields the same lower bounds for unateness and being a k-junta. These lower bounds improve exponentially on the existing lower bounds for these properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 41d7e3f5-45b6-4fe3-a80f-718f42a463bcCited by top-tier papers15
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 18 citations
- Properly learning monotone functions via local correctionJane Lange, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Arsen VasilyanFOCS 2022 · 5 citations
- Directed Isoperimetric Theorems for Boolean Functions on the Hypergrid and an Õ(n√d) Monotonicity TesterHadley Black, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, C. SeshadhriSTOC 2023 · 5 citations
- Estimating the Longest Increasing Subsequence in Nearly Optimal TimeAlexandr Andoni, Negev Shekel Nosatzki, Sandip Sinha, Clifford SteinFOCS 2022 · 4 citations
- Agnostic proper learning of monotone functions: beyond the black-box correction barrierJane Lange, Arsen VasilyanFOCS 2023 · 4 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Mildly Exponential Lower Bounds on Tolerant Testers for Monotonicity, Unateness, and JuntasXi Chen, Anindya De, Yuhao Li, Shivam Nadimpalli et al.SODA 2024
- Optimal Non-adaptive Tolerant Junta Testing via Local EstimatorsShivam Nadimpalli, Shyamal PatelSTOC 2024
- New Lower Bounds for Adaptive Tolerant Junta TestingXi Chen, Shyamal PatelFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
- Boolean Function Monotonicity Testing Requires (Almost) n1/2 QueriesMark Chen, Xi Chen, Hao Cui, William Pires et al.STOC 2026
- Testing forbidden order-pattern properties on hypergridsHarish Chandramouleeswaran, Ilan Newman, Tomer Pelleg, Nithin VarmaSODA 2026
