EMNLP Findings2025
Post-hoc Study of Climate Microtargeting on Social Media Ads with LLMs: Thematic Insights and Fairness Evaluation
Tunazzina Islam, Dan Goldwasser
Abstract
Climate change communication on social media increasingly employs microtargeting strategies to effectively reach and influence specific demographic groups. This study presents a post-hoc analysis of microtargeting practices within climate campaigns by leveraging large language models (LLMs) to examine Meta (previously known as Facebook) advertisements. Our analysis focuses on two key aspects: demographic targeting and fairness. We evaluate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict the intended demographic targets, such as gender and age group. Furthermore, we instruct the LLMs to generate explanations for their classifications, providing transparent reasoning behind each decision. These explanations reveal the specific thematic elements used to engage different demographic segments, highlighting distinct strategies tailored to various audiences. Our findings show that young adults are primarily targeted through messages emphasizing activism and environmental consciousness, while women are engaged through themes related to caregiving roles and social advocacy. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive fairness analysis to uncover biases in model predictions. We assess disparities in accuracy and error rates across demographic groups using established fairness metrics such as Demographic Parity, Equal Opportunity, and Predictive Equality. Our findings indicate that while LLMs perform well overall, certain biases exist, particularly in the classification of male audiences. The analysis of thematic explanations uncovers recurring patterns in messaging strategies tailored to various demographic groups, while the fairness analysis underscores the need for more inclusive targeting methods. This study provides a valuable framework for future research aimed at enhancing transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in social media-driven climate campaigns.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
- LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic AnalysisShih-Chieh Dai, Aiping Xiong, Lun-Wei KuEMNLP Findings 2023 · 110 citations
- Facebook Ads Monitor: An Independent Auditing System for Political Ads on FacebookMárcio Silva, Lucas Santos de Oliveira, Athanasios Andreou, Pedro Olmo Stancioli Vaz de Melo et al.WWW 2020 · 71 citations
Related papers
- Who Gets Which Message? Auditing Demographic Bias in LLM-Generated Targeted TextTunazzina IslamACL Findings 2026
- Adaptable Moral Stances of Large Language Models on Sexist Content: Implications for Society and Gender DiscourseRongchen Guo, Isar Nejadgholi, Hillary Dawkins, Kathleen C. Fraser et al.EMNLP 2024
- Fairness Perceptions of Large Language ModelsBenjamin Cookson, Soroush Ebadian, Nisarg ShahAAAI 2026
- Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated ReasoningSaloni Dash, Amélie Reymond, Emma S. Spiro, Aylin CaliskanACL Findings 2026 · 1 citation
- Reading Between the Tokens: Improving Preference Predictions through Mechanistic ForecastingSarah Ball, Simeon Allmendinger, Frauke Kreuter, Niklas KühlICML 2026
