R-WoM: Retrieval-augmented World Model For Computer-use Agents
Kai Mei, Jiang Guo, Shuaichen Chang, Mingwen Dong, Dongkyu Lee, Xing Niu, Jiarong Jiang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can serve as world models to enhance agent decision-making in digital environments by simulating future states and predicting action outcomes, potentially eliminating costly trial-and-error exploration. However, this capability is fundamentally limited by LLM's tendency to hallucination and their reliance on static training knowledge, which could lead to compounding errors that inhibit long-horizon simulations. To systematically investigate whether LLMs are appropriate for world modeling, we probe two core capabilities of world models -- future state prediction and reward estimation -- through three tasks: next-state identification, full-procedure planning alignment, and milestone transition recognition. Our analysis shows that while LLMs effectively capture immediate next states and identify meaningful state transitions, their performance rapidly degrades in full-procedure planning. This highlights LLMs’ limitations in reliably modeling environment dynamics over long horizons. To address these limitations, we propose the Retrieval-augmented World Model (R-WoM), which grounds LLM simulations by incorporating factual, up-to-date knowledge retrieved from external tutorials. Experiments show that R-WoM achieves relative improvements of up to 23.4% and 16.3% on the subsets of OSWorld and Webarena compared to baselines, with particular advantage in longer-horizon simulations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 415e0cdb-375d-48cd-bf15-d624e67b8a79Cited by top-tier papers2
- OS-Symphony: A Holistic Framework for Robust and Generalist Computer-Using AgentsBowen Yang, Kaiming Jin, Zhenyu Wu, Zhaoyang Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 15 citations
- Reasoning over Precedents Alongside Statutes: Case-Augmented Deliberative Alignment for LLM SafetyCan Jin, Rui Wu, Tong Che, Qixin Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on11
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- Generative Judge for Evaluating AlignmentJunlong Li, Shichao Sun, Weizhe Yuan, Run-Ze Fan et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World ModelShibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Jiahua Hong et al.EMNLP 2023 · 109 citations
- ComputerRL: Scaling End-to-End Online Reinforcement Learning for Computer Use AgentsHanyu Lai, Xiao Liu, Yanxiao Zhao, Han Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 45 citations
Related papers
- Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web NavigationHyungjoo Chae, Namyoung Kim, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Minju Gwak et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- Agent Planning with World Knowledge ModelShuofei Qiao, Runnan Fang, Ningyu Zhang, Yuqi Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 95 citations
- From Word to World: Can Large Language Models be Implicit Text-based World Models?Yixia Li, Hongru Wang, Jiahao Qiu, Zhenfei Yin et al.ACL 2026 · 27 citations
- WebEvolver: Enhancing Web Agent Self-Improvement with Co-evolving World ModelTianqing Fang, Hongming Zhang, Zhisong Zhang, Kaixin Ma et al.EMNLP 2025
- Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And PlanningZhenfang Chen, Delin Chen, Rui Sun, Wenjun Liu et al.ICLR 2025
