Towards Better Laplacian Representation in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Graph Drawing
Kaixin Wang, Kuangqi Zhou, Qixin Zhang, Jie Shao, Bryan Hooi, Jiashi Feng
Abstract
The Laplacian representation recently gains increasing attention for reinforcement learning as it provides succinct and informative representation for states, by taking the eigenvectors of the Laplacian matrix of the state-transition graph as state embeddings. Such representation captures the geometry of the underlying state space and is beneficial to RL tasks such as option discovery and reward shaping. To approximate the Laplacian representation in large (or even continuous) state spaces, recent works propose to minimize a spectral graph drawing objective, which however has infinitely many global minimizers other than the eigenvectors. As a result, their learned Laplacian representation may differ from the ground truth. To solve this problem, we reformulate the graph drawing objective into a generalized form and derive a new learning objective, which is proved to have eigenvectors as its unique global minimizer. It enables learning high-quality Laplacian representations that faithfully approximate the ground truth. We validate this via comprehensive experiments on a set of gridworld and continuous control environments. Moreover, we show that our learned Laplacian representations lead to more exploratory options and better reward shaping.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 409a4256-8580-4bc7-b2da-bd2944326ffcCited by top-tier papers19
- Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics ModelsUladzislau Sobal, Wancong Zhang, Kyunghyun Cho, Randall Balestriero et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 109 citations
- Deep Laplacian-based Options for Temporally-Extended ExplorationMartin Klissarov, Marlos C. MachadoICML 2023 · 31 citations
- Scalable Multi-agent Covering Option Discovery based on Kronecker GraphsJiayu Chen, Jingdi Chen, Tian Lan, Vaneet AggarwalNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Reachability-Aware Laplacian Representation in Reinforcement LearningKaixin Wang, Kuangqi Zhou, Jiashi Feng, Bryan Hooi et al.ICML 2023 · 10 citations
- A Unified Algorithm Framework for Unsupervised Discovery of Skills based on Determinantal Point ProcessJiayu Chen, Vaneet Aggarwal, Tian LanNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
Builds on4
- Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningAdam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael LaskinICML 2021 · 389 citations
- Count-Based Exploration with the Successor RepresentationMarlos C. Machado, Marc G. Bellemare, Michael BowlingAAAI 2020 · 206 citations
- Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Deep Covering OptionsYuu Jinnai, Jee Won Park, Marlos C. Machado, George Dimitri KonidarisICLR 2020 · 64 citations
- Contrastive Behavioral Similarity Embeddings for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Marlos C. Machado, Pablo Samuel Castro, Marc G. BellemareICLR 2021 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Proper Laplacian Representation LearningDiego Gomez, Michael Bowling, Marlos C. MachadoICLR 2024 · 11 citations
- Online Laplacian-Based Representation Learning in Reinforcement LearningMaheed H. Ahmed, Jayanth Bhargav, Mahsa GhasemiICML 2025
- Impact of Connectivity on Laplacian Representations in Reinforcement LearningTommaso Giorgi, Pierriccardo Olivieri, Keyue Jiang, Laura Toni et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Novel Exploration via OrthogonalityAndreas Theophilou, Özgür SimsekNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Option Discovery in the Absence of Rewards with Manifold AnalysisAmitay Bar, Ronen Talmon, Ron MeirICML 2020 · 6 citations
