Mitigating Reward Over-Optimization in RLHF via Behavior-Supported Regularization
Juntao Dai, Taiye Chen, Yaodong Yang, Qian Zheng, Gang Pan
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is an effective method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values. However, reward over-optimization remains an open challenge leading to discrepancies between the performance of LLMs under the reward model and the true human objectives. A primary contributor to reward over-optimization is the extrapolation error that arises when the reward model evaluates out-of-distribution (OOD) responses. However, current methods still fail to prevent the increasing frequency of OOD response generation during the reinforcement learning (RL) process and are not effective at handling extrapolation errors from OOD responses. In this work, we propose the Behavior-Supported Policy Optimization (BSPO) method to mitigate the reward over-optimization issue. Specifically, we define behavior policy as the next token distribution of the reward training dataset to model the in-distribution (ID) region of the reward model. Building on this, we introduce the behaviorsupported Bellman operator to regularize the value function, penalizing all OOD values without impacting the ID ones. Consequently, BSPO reduces the generation of OOD responses during the RL process, thereby avoiding overestimation caused by the reward model's extrapolation errors. Theoretically, we prove that BSPO guarantees a monotonic improvement of the supported policy until convergence to the optimal behavior-supported policy. Empirical results from extensive experiments show that BSPO outperforms baselines in preventing reward overoptimization due to OOD evaluation and finding the optimal ID policy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 408e35f7-5386-4ad3-89c7-26b503e14d9dCited by top-tier papers3
- Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are ComplementaryZhiwei Zhang, Hui Liu, Xiaomin Li, Zhenwei Dai et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- OPPO: Accelerating PPO-based RLHF via Pipeline OverlapKaizhuo Yan, Yingjie Yu, Yifan Yu, Haizhong Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- A Checks-and-Balances Framework for Context-Aware Ethical AI AlignmentEdward Y. ChangICML 2025
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
Related papers
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
- Real-Time Aligned Reward Model beyond SemanticsZixuan Huang, Xin Xia, Yuxi Ren, Jianbin Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFShicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai et al.ICLR 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy DistillationSongming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Tong Zhang, Bojie Hu et al.ACL 2025
