What do you know? Bayesian knowledge inference for navigating agents
Matthias Schultheis, Jana-Sophie Schönfeld, Constantin A. Rothkopf, Heinz Koeppl
Abstract
Human behavior is characterized by continuous learning to reduce uncertainties about the world in pursuit of goals. When trying to understand such behavior from observations, it is essential to account for this adaptive nature and reason about the uncertainties that may have led to seemingly suboptimal decisions. Nevertheless, most inverse approaches to sequential decision-making focus on inferring cost functions underlying stationary behavior or are limited to low-dimensional tasks. In this paper, we address this gap by considering the problem of inferring an agent's knowledge or awareness about the environment based on a given trajectory. We assume that the agent aims to reach a goal in an environment they only partially know, and integrates new information into their plan as they act. We propose a Bayesian approach to infer their latent knowledge state, leveraging an approximate navigation model that optimistically incorporates partial information while accounting for uncertainty. By combining sample-based Bayesian inference with dynamic graph algorithms, we achieve an efficient method for computing posterior beliefs about the agent's knowledge. Empirical validation using simulated behavioral data and human data from an online experiment demonstrates that our model effectively captures human navigation under uncertainty and reveals interpretable insights into their environmental knowledge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 408d8e82-4515-4c70-b5fc-bc3c238c693aBuilds on10
- Online Bayesian Goal Inference for Boundedly Rational Planning AgentsTan Zhi-Xuan, Jordyn L. Mann, Tom Silver, Josh Tenenbaum et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 122 citations
- Dynamic Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Characterizing Animal BehaviorZoe Ashwood, Aditi Jha, Jonathan W. PillowNeurIPS 2022 · 50 citations
- Inverse Rational Control with Partially Observable Continuous Nonlinear DynamicsMinhae Kwon, Saurabh Daptardar, Paul R. Schrater, Xaq PitkowNeurIPS 2020 · 46 citations
- Inferring learning rules from animal decision-makingZoe Ashwood, Nicholas A. Roy, Ji Hyun Bak, Jonathan W. PillowNeurIPS 2020 · 33 citations
- Inverse Optimal Control Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Human Sensorimotor SystemMatthias Schultheis, Dominik Straub, Constantin A. RothkopfNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Probabilistic inverse optimal control for non-linear partially observable systems disentangles perceptual uncertainty and behavioral costsDominik Straub, Matthias Schultheis, Heinz Koeppl, Constantin A. RothkopfNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- Inverse Decision Modeling: Learning Interpretable Representations of BehaviorDaniel Jarrett, Alihan Hüyük, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2021 · 30 citations
- Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDexter R. R. Scobee, S. Shankar SastryICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Information is Power: Intrinsic Control via Information CaptureNicholas Rhinehart, Jenny Wang, Glen Berseth, John D. Co-Reyes et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 14 citations
- Estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planningSounak Banerjee, Daphne Cornelisse, Deepak E. Gopinath, Emily Sumner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
