VitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications
Wei He, Yueqing Sun, Hongyan Hao, Xueyuan Hao, Zhikang Xia, Qi Gu, Hui Su, Xunliang Cai
Abstract
As LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed in real-life scenarios, existing benchmarks fail to capture their inherent complexity of handling extensive information, leveraging diverse resources, and managing dynamic user interactions. To address this gap, we introduce VitaBench, a challenging benchmark that evaluates agents on versatile interactive tasks grounded in real-world settings. Drawing from daily applications in food delivery, in-store consumption, and online travel services, VitaBench presents agents with the most complex life-serving simulation environment to date, comprising 66 tools. Through a framework that eliminates domain-specific policies, we enable flexible composition of these scenarios and tools, yielding 100 cross-scenario tasks (main results) and 300 single-scenario tasks. Each task is derived from multiple real user requests and requires agents to reason across temporal and spatial dimensions, utilize complex tool sets, proactively clarify ambiguous instructions, and track shifting user intent throughout multi-turn conversations. Moreover, we propose a rubric-based sliding window evaluator, enabling robust assessment of diverse solution pathways in complex environments and stochastic interactions. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that even the most advanced models achieve only 30% success rate on cross-scenario tasks, and less than 50% success rate on others. Overall, we believe VitaBench will serve as a valuable resource for advancing the development of AI agents in practical real-world applications. The code, dataset, and leaderboard are available at https://vitabench.github.io/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 407abe33-21bd-48fc-a779-8a7ab32c333aBuilds on7
- ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,469 citations
- MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language FeedbackXingyao Wang, Zihan Wang, Jiateng Liu, Yangyi Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 308 citations
- MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to UseYue Huang, Jiawen Shi, Yuan Li, Chenrui Fan et al.ICLR 2024 · 188 citations
- ExpertLongBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Expert-Level Long-Form Generation Tasks with Structured ChecklistsJie Ruan, Inderjeet Nair, Shuyang Cao, Amy Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear InstructionWenxuan Wang, Juluan Shi, Zixuan Ling, Yuk-Kit Chan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Beyond Itinerary Planning - A Real-World Benchmark for Multi-Turn and Tool-Using Travel TasksXiang Cheng, Yulan Hu, Xiangwen Zhang, Lu Xu et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language AgentsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 376 citations
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World UncertaintyJohannes Kirmayr, Lukas Stappen, Elisabeth AndréACL 2026 · 5 citations
- AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-UseJunzhi Chen, Harsh Trivedi, Jane Pan, Michael Zhang et al.ICML 2026
