Efficient Algorithms for Budgeted Influence Maximization on Massive Social Networks
Song Bian, Qintian Guo, Sibo Wang, Jeffrey Xu Yu
Abstract
Given a social network G, a cost associated with each node, and a budget B, the budgeted influence maximization (BIM) problem aims to find a set S of nodes, denoted as the seed set, that maximizes the expected number of influenced users under the constraint that the total cost of the users in S is no larger than B. The current state-of-the-art practical solution for BIM problem provides a (1-1/e/2 --- ε)-approximate (≈ 0.316 --- ε) result and is still inefficient on large networks. We first show that we can improve the approximation guarantee to 1 --- 1/eβ --- ε where 1 --- 1/eβ = (1 --- β) (1 --- 1/e), achieving a better approximation guarantee (≈ 0.355 --- ε). Next, we apply the reverse sampling based technique, a popular technique for classic influence maximization, to our studied BIM problem. However, it is non-trivial to design efficient solutions for large scale networks even the reverse sampling based technique is applied. On one hand, it is unclear how to derive tight bounds for the nodes selected by the greedy algorithm under the budgeted scenario, where each time it selects the seed node with the highest benefit-cost ratio. With tighter bounds, the algorithm can terminate as soon as the approximation ratio is satisfied, thus saving the running cost. On the other hand, the number of nodes selected under BIM problem may be quite large since it may greedily select many nodes with large benefit-cost ratio but with low costs. The time complexity of existing influence maximization algorithms heavily depends on the size of the seed set. To tackle such challenging issues, we first present new bound estimation techniques for the BIM problem. Next, we present new node selection strategies to alleviate the dependency to the size of the seed set. Extensive experiments show that our proposed solution is far more efficient than alternatives.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 404193e2-08e9-4d0b-802d-bea719ccb0cfCited by top-tier papers14
- Unconstrained Submodular Maximization with Modular Costs: Tight Approximation and Application to Profit MaximizationTianyuan Jin, Yu Yang, Renchi Yang, Jieming Shi et al.VLDB 2021 · 31 citations
- Influence Maximization in Real-World Closed Social NetworksShixun Huang, Wenqing Lin, Zhifeng Bao, Jiachen SunVLDB 2023 · 25 citations
- CompressGraph: Efficient Parallel Graph Analytics with Rule-Based CompressionZheng Chen, Feng Zhang, Jiawei Guan, Jidong Zhai et al.SIGMOD 2023 · 23 citations
- Capacity Constrained Influence Maximization in Social NetworksShiqi Zhang, Yiqian Huang, Jiachen Sun, Wenqing Lin et al.KDD 2023 · 19 citations
- Minimizing the Regret of an Influence ProviderYipeng Zhang, Yuchen Li, Zhifeng Bao, Baihua Zheng et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Algorithm for Budgeted Adaptive Influence Maximization: An Incremental RR-set Update ApproachQintian Guo, Chen Feng, Fangyuan Zhang, Sibo WangSIGMOD 2024 · 15 citations
- Gradient Method for Continuous Influence Maximization with Budget-Saving ConsiderationsWei Chen, Weizhong Zhang, Haoyu ZhaoAAAI 2020 · 9 citations
- Triangular Stability Maximization by Influence Spread over Social NetworksZheng Hu, Weiguo Zheng, Xiang LianVLDB 2023 · 10 citations
- Influence Maximization Revisited: Efficient Reverse Reachable Set Generation with Bound TightenedQintian Guo, Sibo Wang, Zhewei Wei, Ming ChenSIGMOD 2020 · 80 citations
- Scalable Fair Influence MaximizationXiaobin Rui, Zhixiao Wang, Jiayu Zhao, Lichao Sun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
