Beyond Mode Collapse: Distribution Matching for Diverse Reasoning
Xiaozhe Li, Yang Li, Xinyu Fang, Shengyuan Ding, Peiji Li, Yongkang Chen, Yichuan Ma, TianYi Lyu, Linyang Li, Dahua Lin, Qipeng Guo, Qingwen Liu, Kai Chen
Abstract
On-policy reinforcement learning methods like GRPO suffer from mode collapse: they exhibit reduced solution diversity, concentrating probability mass on a single solution once discovered and ceasing exploration of alternative strategies. We show this stems from reverse KL minimization's mode-seeking behavior, which reinforces the first high-reward trajectory found rather than maintaining a distribution over multiple diverse solutions. We propose DMPO (Distribution-Matching Policy Optimization), which prevents mode collapse through principled approximation of forward KL minimization. DMPO constructs a group-level target distribution over sampled trajectories proportional to their rewards, then aligns the policy distribution to this target. This provides mode-covering behavior without requiring sampling from the intractable global target distribution, enabling sustained exploration throughout training. We validate DMPO on NP-hard combinatorial optimization, where exponentially many feasible solutions exist but only a few approach optimality—an ideal testbed for evaluating exploration. DMPO achieves 43.9% Quality Ratio on text-based NP-Bench (vs. GRPO's 40.1%) and 43.1% on vision-based NP-Bench (vs. 38.4%)—demonstrating 9% and 12% relative improvements respectively. These gains generalize to mathematical reasoning (+2.0%) and out-of-domain tasks (+2.3%), showing that diversity-preserving training enhances general reasoning capabilities across modalities. Our work establishes distribution matching as a practical, principled approach to preventing mode collapse in on-policy RL, with consistent quality improvements demonstrating sustained exploration across diverse reasoning tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 40000f17-8f40-49f2-bc7e-315148b5be07Builds on14
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
- Learning to Reason under Off-Policy GuidanceJianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
Related papers
- Expected Return Causes Outcome-Level Mode Collapse in Reinforcement Learning and How to Fix It with Inverse Probability ScalingAbhijeet Sinha, Sundari Elango, Dianbo LiuICML 2026 · 2 citations
- FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM ReasoningXuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Dinghuai Zhang, Hengli Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 41 citations
- All Roads Lead to Rome: Incentivizing Divergent Thinking in Vision-Language ModelsXinyu Tian, Shu Zou, Zhaoyuan Yang, Mengqi He et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- GRPO: Geometric GRPO; Escaping LLM's Reasoning Rut to Break Accuracy--Entropy Trade-offAli Rad, Khashayar Filom, Darioush Keivan, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani et al.ICML 2026
- Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and MitigationXixiang He, Qiyao Sun, Ao Cheng, Xingming Li et al.ICML 2026
