Target-based Surrogates for Stochastic Optimization
Jonathan Wilder Lavington, Sharan Vaswani, Reza Babanezhad Harikandeh, Mark Schmidt, Nicolas Le Roux
Abstract
We consider minimizing functions for which it is expensive to compute the (possibly stochastic) gradient. Such functions are prevalent in reinforcement learning, imitation learning and adversarial training. Our target optimization framework uses the (expensive) gradient computation to construct surrogate functions in a target space (e.g. the logits output by a linear model for classification) that can be minimized efficiently. This allows for multiple parameter updates to the model, amortizing the cost of gradient computation. In the full-batch setting, we prove that our surrogate is a global upper-bound on the loss, and can be (locally) minimized using a black-box optimization algorithm. We prove that the resulting majorization-minimization algorithm ensures convergence to a stationary point of the loss. Next, we instantiate our framework in the stochastic setting and propose the algorithm, which can be viewed as projected stochastic gradient descent in the target space. This connection enables us to prove theoretical guarantees for when minimizing convex functions. Our framework allows the use of standard stochastic optimization algorithms to construct surrogates which can be minimized by any deterministic optimization method. To evaluate our framework, we consider a suite of supervised learning and imitation learning problems. Our experiments indicate the benefits of target optimization and the effectiveness of .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fee6573-c690-4634-9ca5-607c5c9fbfd4Cited by top-tier papers3
- Decision-Aware Actor-Critic with Function Approximation and Theoretical GuaranteesSharan Vaswani, Amirreza Kazemi, Reza Babanezhad Harikandeh, Nicolas Le RouxNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- From Inverse Optimization to Feasibility to ERMSaurabh Mishra, Anant Raj, Sharan VaswaniICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Solving hidden monotone variational inequalities with surrogate lossesRyan D'Orazio, Danilo Vucetic, Zichu Liu, Junhyung Lyle Kim et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on4
- A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and PerformanceXiaoyu Li, Zhenxun Zhuang, Francesco OrabonaICML 2021 · 29 citations
- Stochastic Optimization with Laggard Data PipelinesNaman Agarwal, Rohan Anil, Tomer Koren, Kunal Talwar et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 14 citations
- Guided Learning of Nonconvex Models through Successive Functional Gradient OptimizationRie Johnson, Tong ZhangICML 2020 · 8 citations
- Towards Noise-adaptive, Problem-adaptive (Accelerated) Stochastic Gradient DescentSharan Vaswani, Benjamin Dubois-Taine, Reza BabanezhadICML 2022
Related papers
- Min-Max Optimization without Gradients: Convergence and Applications to Black-Box Evasion and Poisoning AttacksSijia Liu, Songtao Lu, Xiangyi Chen, Yao Feng et al.ICML 2020 · 68 citations
- Two Losses Are Better Than One: Faster Optimization Using a Cheaper ProxyBlake E. Woodworth, Konstantin Mishchenko, Francis R. BachICML 2023 · 9 citations
- Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Algorithm for Black-box Multi-Objective LearningFeiyang Ye, Yueming Lyu, Xuehao Wang, Yu Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- New Insight of Variance reduce in Zero-Order Hard-Thresholding: Mitigating Gradient Error and Expansivity ContradictionsXinzhe Yuan, William de Vazelhes, Bin Gu, Huan XiongICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Zeroth-Order Hard-Thresholding: Gradient Error vs. ExpansivityWilliam de Vazelhes, Hualin Zhang, Huimin Wu, Xiaotong Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 4 citations
