Generating EDU Extracts for Plan-Guided Summary Re-Ranking
Griffin Adams, Alexander R. Fabbri, Faisal Ladhak, Noémie Elhadad, Kathleen R. McKeown
Abstract
Two-step approaches, in which summary candidates are generated-then-reranked to return a single summary, can improve ROUGE scores over the standard single-step approach. Yet, standard decoding methods (i.e., beam search, nucleus sampling, and diverse beam search) produce candidates with redundant, and often low quality, content. In this paper, we design a novel method to generate candidates for re-ranking that addresses these issues. We ground each candidate abstract on its own unique content plan and generate distinct plan-guided abstracts using a model's top beam. More concretely, a standard language model (a BART LM) auto-regressively generates elemental discourse unit (EDU) content plans with an extractive copy mechanism. The top K beams from the content plan generator are then used to guide a separate LM, which produces a single abstractive candidate for each distinct plan. We apply an existing re-ranker (BRIO) to abstractive candidates generated from our method, as well as baseline decoding methods. We show large relevance improvements over previously published methods on widely used single document news article corpora, with ROUGE-2 F1 gains of 0.88, 2.01, and 0.38 on CNN / Dailymail, NYT, and Xsum, respectively. A human evaluation on CNN / DM validates these results. Similarly, on 1k samples from CNN / DM, we show that prompting GPT-3 to follow EDU plans outperforms sampling-based methods by 1.05 ROUGE-2 F1 points. Code to generate and realize plans is available at https: //github.com/griff4692/edu-sum.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f8e34a0-75b9-4113-8f8a-515e08a79702Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
Related papers
- SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive SummarizationMathieu Ravaut, Shafiq R. Joty, Nancy F. ChenACL 2022 · 116 citations
- Factorizing Content and Budget Decisions in Abstractive Summarization of Long DocumentsMarcio Fonseca, Yftah Ziser, Shay B. CohenEMNLP 2022 · 14 citations
- Learn to Copy from the Copying History: Correlational Copy Network for Abstractive SummarizationHaoran Li, Song Xu, Peng Yuan, Yujia Wang et al.EMNLP 2021 · 11 citations
- Pre-training for Abstractive Document Summarization by Reinstating Source TextYanyan Zou, Xingxing Zhang, Wei Lu, Furu Wei et al.EMNLP 2020 · 42 citations
- Z-Code++: A Pre-trained Language Model Optimized for Abstractive SummarizationPengcheng He, Baolin Peng, Song Wang, Yang Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 27 citations
