Noise and the Frontier of Quantum Supremacy
Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu
Abstract
Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f3396ca-7f37-4aae-b046-ce3e410f8f76Cited by top-tier papers4
- A Polynomial-Time Classical Algorithm for Noisy Random Circuit SamplingDorit Aharonov, Xun Gao, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu et al.STOC 2023 · 74 citations
- Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuitsYasuhiro Kondo, Ryuhei Mori, Ramis MovassaghFOCS 2021 · 14 citations
- Founding Quantum Cryptography on Quantum Advantage, or, Towards Cryptography from #P HardnessDakshita Khurana, Kabir TomerSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Exponential improvements to the average-case hardness of BosonSamplingAdam Bouland, Ishaun Datta, Bill Fefferman, Felipe HernandezFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant DepthJoel Rajakumar, James D. Watson, Yi-Kai LiuSODA 2025 · 7 citations
- Certified Randomness from Quantum SupremacyScott Aaronson, Shih-Han HungSTOC 2023 · 18 citations
- Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy Quantum Circuits with Naturally Fault-Tolerant GatesJon Nelson, Joel Rajakumar, Dominik Hangleiter, Michael J. GullansSODA 2026
- Massively Parallel Approximate Simulation of Hard Quantum CircuitsIgor L. Markov, Aneeqa Fatima, Sergei V. Isakov, Sergio BoixoDAC 2020 · 15 citations
- Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum StatesYusen Wu, Bujiao Wu, Yanqi Song, Xiao Yuan et al.ICLR 2025
