Lune

ICML2026Top-tier venue

Dissecting Quantization Error: A Concentration-Alignment Perspective

Marco Federici, Boris van Breugel, Paul Whatmough, Markus Nagel

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

Quantization can drastically increase the efficiency of large language and vision models, but typically incurs an accuracy drop. Recently, function-preserving transforms (e.g. rotations, Hadamard transform, channel-wise scaling) have been successfully applied to reduce post-training quantization error, yet a principled explanation remains elusive. We analyze linear-layer quantization via the signal-to-quantization-noise ratio (SQNR), showing that for uniform integer quantization at a fixed bit width, SQNR decomposes into (i) the concentration of weights and activations (capturing spread and outliers), and (ii) the alignment of their dominant variation directions. This reveals an actionable insight: beyond concentration -the focus of most prior transforms (e.g. rotations or Hadamard) -improving alignment between weight and activation can further reduce quantization error. Motivated by this, we introduce block Concentration-Alignment Transforms (CAT), a lightweight linear transformation that uses a covariance estimate from a small calibration set to jointly improve concentration and alignment, approximately maximizing SQNR. Experiments across several LLMs show that CAT consistently matches or outperforms prior transformbased quantization methods at 4-bit precision, confirming the insights gained in our framework.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 3f2dd878-bdbb-428c-b159-009e64ed407f

Builds on8

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines