Enhancing Multiple Dimensions of Trustworthiness in LLMs via Sparse Activation Control
Yuxin Xiao, Chaoqun Wan, Yonggang Zhang, Wenxiao Wang, Binbin Lin, Xiaofei He, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye
Abstract
As the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, enhancing their trustworthiness and aligning them with human preferences has become a critical area of research. Traditional methods rely heavily on extensive data for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), but representation engineering offers a new, training-free approach. This technique leverages semantic features to control the representation of LLM's intermediate hidden states, enabling the model to meet specific requirements such as increased honesty or heightened safety awareness. However, a significant challenge arises when attempting to fulfill multiple requirements simultaneously. It proves difficult to encode various semantic contents, like honesty and safety, into a singular semantic feature, restricting its practicality. In this work, we address this issue through ``Sparse Activation Control''. By delving into the intrinsic mechanisms of LLMs, we manage to identify and pinpoint components that are closely related to specific tasks within the model, i.e., attention heads. These heads display sparse characteristics that allow for near-independent control over different tasks. Our experiments, conducted on the open-source Llama series models, have yielded encouraging results. The models were able to align with human preferences on issues of safety, factuality, and bias concurrently.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3ec48b37-ea90-4554-a737-08ce228b418dCited by top-tier papers5
- ODESteer: A Unified ODE-Based Steering Framework for LLM AlignmentHongjue Zhao, Haosen Sun, Jiangtao Kong, Xiaochang Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Tracing and Dissecting How LLMs Recall Factual Knowledge for Real World QuestionsYiqun Wang, Chaoqun Wan, Sile Hu, Yonggang Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 2 citations
- Investigating Hallucinations of Time Series Foundation Models through Signal Subspace AnalysisYufeng Zou, Zijian Wang, Diego Klabjan, Han LiuNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Bridging the Language Gap: Uncovering and Aligning Shared Circuits for Multi-Hop Reasoning in Multilingual LLMsChenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Xinmei Tian et al.AAAI 2026
- Eliciting Chain-of-Thought in Base LLMs via Gradient-Based Representation OptimizationZijian Wang, Yanxiang Ma, Chang XuAAAI 2026
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Alias-Free Generative Adversarial NetworksTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Samuli Laine, Erik Härkönen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,126 citations
Related papers
- Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation EngineeringWenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
- The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational IndependenceTom Wollschläger, Jannes Elstner, Simon Geisler, Vincent Cohen-Addad et al.ICML 2025
- PaCE: Parsimonious Concept Engineering for Large Language ModelsJinqi Luo, Tianjiao Ding, Kwan Ho Ryan Chan, Darshan Thaker et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language ModelsZirui He, Mingyu Jin, Bo Shen, Ali Payani et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Preference Alignment On TrustworthinessAaron Jiaxun Li, Satyapriya Krishna, Himabindu LakkarajuICLR 2025
