Beyond the Norms: Detecting Prediction Errors in Regression Models
Andrés Altieri, Marco Romanelli, Georg Pichler, Florence Alberge, Pablo Piantanida
Abstract
This paper tackles the challenge of detecting unreliable behavior in regression algorithms, which may arise from intrinsic variability (e.g., aleatoric uncertainty) or modeling errors (e.g., model uncertainty). First, we formally introduce the notion of unreliability in regression, i.e., when the output of the regressor exceeds a specified discrepancy (or error). Then, using powerful tools for probabilistic modeling, we estimate the discrepancy density, and we measure its statistical diversity using our proposed metric for statistical dissimilarity. In turn, this allows us to derive a data-driven score that expresses the uncertainty of the regression outcome. We show empirical improvements in error detection for multiple regression tasks, consistently outperforming popular baseline approaches, and contributing to the broader field of uncertainty quantification and safe machine learning systems. Our code is available at https: //zenodo.org/records/11281964 . This work aims to develop a simple yet effective framework to evaluate the reliability of the predictions of a given regressor and detect potentially anomalous situations that may arise. Our approach involves data-driven techniques to address the inherent challenges in the detection problem, particularly in compensating for estimation inaccuracies associated with baseline methods relying on the estimation of the conditional distribution of the dependent target variable. Contributions Our main contributions can be summarized as follows: 1. We study a novel detection challenge focused on identifying inaccuracies in the predictions made by a regres-
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3ddc5697-772d-498d-bdb4-909daa621f70Cited by top-tier papers2
- Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent KernelJoseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson, Fred RoostaNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric RiskIlia Azizi, Juraj Bodik, Jakob Heiss, Bin YuICLR 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on6
- Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk MinimizationLang Huang, Chao Zhang, Hongyang ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 256 citations
- Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty QuantificationYoungseog Chung, Willie Neiswanger, Ian Char, Jeff SchneiderNeurIPS 2021 · 137 citations
- DOCTOR: A Simple Method for Detecting Misclassification ErrorsFederica Granese, Marco Romanelli, Daniele Gorla, Catuscia Palamidessi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 65 citations
- Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Single Deterministic Neural NetworkNikita Kotelevskii, Aleksandr Artemenkov, Kirill Fedyanin, Fedor Noskov et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
- Igeood: An Information Geometry Approach to Out-of-Distribution DetectionEduardo Dadalto Câmara Gomes, Florence Alberge, Pierre Duhamel, Pablo PiantanidaICLR 2022 · 32 citations
Related papers
- Towards a Certificate of Trust: Task-Aware OOD Detection for Scientific AIBogdan Raonic, Siddhartha Mishra, Samuel LanthalerICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Detecting Misclassification Errors in Neural Networks with a Gaussian Process ModelXin Qiu, Risto MiikkulainenAAAI 2022 · 13 citations
- PAGER: Accurate Failure Characterization in Deep Regression ModelsJayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Vivek Sivaraman Narayanaswamy, Puja Trivedi, Rushil AnirudhICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-ClassificationEtash Kumar Guha, Shlok Natarajan, Thomas Möllenhoff, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Towards More Trustworthy Deep Code Models by Enabling Out-of-Distribution DetectionYanfu Yan, Viet Duong, Huajie Shao, Denys PoshyvanykICSE 2025 · 1 citation
