MuseScorer: Idea Originality Scoring At Scale
Ali Sarosh Bangash, Krish Veera, Ishfat Abrar Islam, Raiyan Abdul Baten
Abstract
An objective, face-valid method for scoring idea originality is to measure each idea's statistical infrequency within a population-an approach long used in creativity research. Yet, computing these frequencies requires manually bucketing idea rephrasings, a process that is subjective, labor-intensive, error-prone, and brittle at scale. We introduce MUSESCORER, a fully automated, psychometrically validated system for frequency-based originality scoring. MUSESCORER integrates a Large Language Model (LLM) with externally orchestrated retrieval: given a new idea, it retrieves semantically similar prior idea-buckets and zero-shot prompts the LLM to judge whether the idea fits an existing bucket or forms a new one. These buckets enable frequencybased originality scoring without human annotation. Across five datasets (N participants =1143, n ideas =16,294), MUSESCORER matches human annotators in idea clustering structure (AMI = 0.59) and participant-level scoring (r = 0.89), while demonstrating strong convergent and external validity. The system enables scalable, intent-sensitive, and human-aligned originality assessment for creativity research. 'infrequency' can be reliably operationalized. Second, we release an automated, interpretable scoring pipeline deployable across diverse open-ended ideation tasks, enabling creativity research at scale 1 . More broadly, MUSESCORER demonstrates how advanced NLP methods can address long-standing annotation challenges, providing validated tools that adjacent disciplines can adopt with confidence.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3dd9fd3f-344c-44a2-a505-a1496cb29068Builds on9
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language ModelsUrvashi Khandelwal, Omer Levy, Dan Jurafsky, Luke Zettlemoyer et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,038 citations
- Distilling Knowledge from Reader to Retriever for Question AnsweringGautier Izacard, Edouard GraveICLR 2021 · 317 citations
Related papers
- Measuring LLM Novelty As The Frontier Of Original And High-Quality OutputVishakh Padmakumar, Chen Yueh-Han, Jane Pan, Valerie Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended TasksTan Min Sen, Zachary Choy Kit Chun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Nadya Yuki Wangsajaya et al.ACL 2026
- Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?Sandeep Kumar, Tirthankar Ghosal, Vinayak Goyal, Asif EkbalEMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP ResearchersChenglei Si, Diyi Yang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2025
- Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Large Language Model EvaluatorQian Cao, Xiting Wang, Yuzhuo Yuan, Yahui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
