PATE: Proximity-Aware Time Series Anomaly Evaluation
Ramin Ghorbani, Marcel J. T. Reinders, David M. J. Tax
Abstract
Evaluating anomaly detection algorithms in time series data is critical as inaccuracies can lead to flawed decision-making in various domains where real-time analytics and data-driven strategies are essential. Traditional performance metrics assume iid data and fail to capture the complex temporal dynamics and specific characteristics of time series anomalies, such as early and delayed detections. We introduce Proximity-Aware Time series anomaly Evaluation (PATE), a novel evaluation metric that incorporates the temporal relationship between prediction and anomaly intervals. PATE uses proximity-based weighting considering buffer zones around anomaly intervals, enabling a more detailed and informed assessment of a detection. Using these weights, PATE computes a weighted version of the area under the Precision and Recall curve. Our experiments with synthetic and real-world datasets show the superiority of PATE in providing more sensible and accurate evaluations than other evaluation metrics. We also tested several state-of-the-art anomaly detectors across various benchmark datasets using the PATE evaluation scheme. The results show that a common metric like Point-Adjusted F1 Score fails to characterize the detection performances well, and that PATE is able to provide a more fair model comparison. By introducing PATE, we redefine the understanding of model efficacy that steers future studies toward developing more effective and accurate detection models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3db26c8f-c5a5-4197-abae-add285748ed6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association DiscrepancyJiehui Xu, Haixu Wu, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng LongICLR 2022 · 960 citations
- DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly DetectionYiyuan Yang, Chaoli Zhang, Tian Zhou, Qingsong Wen et al.KDD 2023 · 244 citations
- Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Time-Series Anomaly DetectionSiwon Kim, Kukjin Choi, Hyun-Soo Choi, Byunghan Lee et al.AAAI 2022 · 220 citations
- Volume Under the Surface: A New Accuracy Evaluation Measure for Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJohn Paparrizos, Paul Boniol, Themis Palpanas, Ruey S. Tsay et al.VLDB 2022 · 171 citations
- Local Evaluation of Time Series Anomaly Detection AlgorithmsAlexis Huet, José Manuel Navarro, Dario RossiKDD 2022 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Unraveling the 'Anomaly' in Time Series Anomaly Detection: A Self-supervised Tri-domain SolutionYuting Sun, Guansong Pang, Guanhua Ye, Tong Chen et al.ICDE 2024 · 18 citations
- TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection MethodsXiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu et al.VLDB 2025 · 57 citations
- Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Comprehensive EvaluationSebastian Schmidl, Phillip Wenig, Thorsten PapenbrockVLDB 2022 · 578 citations
- CANDI: Curated Test-Time Adaptation for Multivariate Time-Series Anomaly Detection Under Distribution ShiftHyunGi Kim, Jisoo Mok, Hyungyu Lee, Juhyeon Shin et al.AAAI 2026
- Toward Interpretable Evaluation Measures for Time Series SegmentationFélix Chavelli, Paul Boniol, Michaël ThomazoNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
