Testing Closeness of Multivariate Distributions via Ramsey Theory
Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Sihan Liu
Abstract
We investigate the statistical task of closeness (or equivalence) testing for multidimensional distributions. Specifically, given sample access to two unknown distributions p, q on d, we want to distinguish between the case that p=q versus ||p−q||Ak > є, where ||p−q||Ak denotes the generalized Ak distance between p and q — measuring the maximum discrepancy between the distributions over any collection of k disjoint, axis-aligned rectangles. Our main result is the first closeness tester for this problem with sub-learning sample complexity in any fixed dimension and a nearly-matching sample complexity lower bound. In more detail, we provide a computationally efficient closeness tester with sample complexity O((k6/7/ polyd(є)) logd(k)). On the lower bound side, we establish a qualitatively matching sample complexity lower bound of Ω(k6/7/poly(є)), even for d=2. These sample complexity bounds are surprising because the sample complexity of the problem in the univariate setting is Θ(k4/5/poly(є)). This has the interesting consequence that the jump from one to two dimensions leads to a substantial increase in sample complexity, while increases beyond that do not. As a corollary of our general Ak tester, we obtain dTV-closeness testers for pairs of k-histograms on d over a common unknown partition, and pairs of uniform distributions supported on the union of k unknown disjoint axis-aligned rectangles. Both our algorithm and our lower bound make essential use of tools from Ramsey theory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d7d3730-8e3c-4956-8f8d-e9bb79074a1dCited by top-tier papers4
- Replicable Uniformity TestingSihan Liu, Christopher YeNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Are Two Datasets Close Enough With Statistical Significance? A Kernel Distributional Closeness Testing ApproachZhijian Zhou, Liuhua Peng, Xunye Tian, Mingming Gong et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Testing Distributions against Bounded DistinguishersMark Bun, Rathin Desai, Renato Ferreira Pinto Jr.STOC 2026
- An Auditing Test to Detect Behavioral Shift in Language ModelsLeo Richter, Xuanli He, Pasquale Minervini, Matt J. KusnerICLR 2025
Builds on2
Related papers
- Sequential Algorithms for Testing Closeness of DistributionsAadil Oufkir, Omar Fawzi, Nicolas Flammarion, Aurélien GarivierNeurIPS 2021 · 4 citations
- Replicable Distribution TestingIlias Diakonikolas, Jingyi Gao, Daniel Kane, Sihan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Nearly-Tight Bounds for Testing Histogram DistributionsClément L. Canonne, Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel Kane, Sihan LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 9 citations
- Tight Lower Bound on Equivalence Testing in Conditional Sampling ModelDiptarka Chakraborty, Sourav Chakraborty, Gunjan KumarSODA 2024 · 1 citation
- Testing Self-Reducible SamplersRishiraj Bhattacharyya, Sourav Chakraborty, Yash Pote, Uddalok Sarkar et al.AAAI 2024 · 2 citations
