Few-Shot Design Optimization by Exploiting Auxiliary Information
Arjun Mani, Carl Vondrick, Richard Zemel
Abstract
Many real-world design problems involve optimizing an expensive black-box function f (x), such as hardware design or drug discovery. Bayesian Optimization has emerged as a sampleefficient framework for this problem. However, the basic setting considered by these methods is simplified compared to real-world experimental setups, where experiments often generate a wealth of useful information. We introduce a new setting where an experiment generates high-dimensional auxiliary information h(x) along with the performance measure f (x); moreover, a history of previously solved tasks from the same task family is available for accelerating optimization. A key challenge of our setting is learning how to represent and utilize h(x) for efficiently solving new optimization tasks beyond the task history. We develop a novel approach for this setting based on a neural model which predicts f (x) for unseen designs given a few-shot context containing observations of h(x). We evaluate our method on two challenging domains, robotic hardware design and neural network hyperparameter tuning, and introduce a novel design problem and large-scale benchmark for the former. On both domains, our method utilizes auxiliary feedback effectively to achieve more accurate few-shot prediction and faster optimization of design tasks, significantly outperforming several methods for multi-task optimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d4784d8-4958-494a-8b02-8bbcfab25716Builds on13
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Transformers Can Do Bayesian InferenceSamuel Müller, Noah Hollmann, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif Grabocka et al.ICLR 2022 · 287 citations
- Transformer Neural Processes: Uncertainty-Aware Meta Learning Via Sequence ModelingTung Nguyen, Aditya GroverICML 2022 · 148 citations
- Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising AutoencodersSamuel Stanton, Wesley J. Maddox, Nate Gruver, Phillip M. Maffettone et al.ICML 2022 · 137 citations
- Towards Learning Universal Hyperparameter Optimizers with TransformersYutian Chen, Xingyou Song, Chansoo Lee, Zi Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 106 citations
Related papers
- Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian OptimizationNatalie Maus, Zhiyuan (Jerry) Lin, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan BakshyICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural NetworksShibo Li, Wei W. Xing, Robert M. Kirby, Shandian ZheNeurIPS 2020 · 74 citations
- MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian OptimizationJiarong Pan, Stefan Falkner, Felix Berkenkamp, Joaquin VanschorenICML 2024 · 2 citations
- FSEO: Few-Shot Evolutionary Optimization via Meta-Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective OptimizationXunzhao YuNeurIPS 2025
- Scaling Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization with Large Language ModelsYimeng Zeng, Natalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Jeffrey Tao et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
