Double Descent Meets Out-of-Distribution Detection: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Analysis on the Role of Model Complexity
Mouïn Ben Ammar, David Brellmann, Arturo Mendoza, Antoine Manzanera, Gianni Franchi
Abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for ensuring the reliability and safety of machine learning systems. In recent years, it has received increasing attention, particularly through post-hoc detection and training-based methods. In this paper, we focus on post-hoc OOD detection, which enables identifying OOD samples without altering the model's training procedure or objective. Our primary goal is to investigate the relationship between model capacity and its OOD detection performance. Specifically, we aim to answer the following question: Does the Double Descent phenomenon manifest in post-hoc OOD detection? This question is crucial, as it can reveal whether overparameterization, which is already known to benefit generalization, can also enhance OOD detection. Despite the growing interest in these topics by the classic supervised machine learning community, this intersection remains unexplored for OOD detection. We empirically demonstrate that the Double Descent effect does indeed appear in post-hoc OOD detection. Furthermore, we provide theoretical insights to explain why this phenomenon emerges in such setting. Finally, we show that the overparameterized regime does not yield superior results consistently, and we propose a method to identify the optimal regime for OOD detection based on our observations. Code available here
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3d4530de-cff3-4b17-98da-a9b9320d1d94Builds on19
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Energy-based Out-of-distribution DetectionWeitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John D. Owens, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2020 · 2,213 citations
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest NeighborsYiyou Sun, Yifei Ming, Xiaojin Zhu, Yixuan LiICML 2022 · 789 citations
Related papers
- NECO: NEural Collapse Based Out-of-distribution detectionMouïn Ben Ammar, Nacim Belkhir, Sebastian Popescu, Antoine Manzanera et al.ICLR 2024 · 40 citations
- Enhancing Out-of-Distribution Detection with Extended Logit NormalizationYifan Ding, Xixi Liu, Jonas Unger, Gabriel EilertsenCVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Leveraging Perturbation Robustness to Enhance Out-of-Distribution DetectionWenxi Chen, Raymond A. Yeh, Shaoshuai Mou, Yan GuCVPR 2025
- Revisiting Logit Distributions for Reliable Out-of-Distribution DetectionJiachen Liang, Ruibing Hou, Minyang Hu, Hong Chang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- The Best of Both Worlds: On the Dilemma of Out-of-distribution DetectionQingyang Zhang, Qiuxuan Feng, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Yatao Bian et al.NeurIPS 2024
