Enhancing the Inductive Biases of Graph Neural ODE for Modeling Physical Systems
Suresh Bishnoi, Ravinder Bhattoo, Jayadeva, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop Krishnan
Abstract
Neural networks with physics-based inductive biases such as Lagrangian neural networks (LNNs), and Hamiltonian neural networks (HNNs) learn the dynamics of physical systems by encoding strong inductive biases. Alternatively, Neural ODEs with appropriate inductive biases have also been shown to give similar performances. However, these models, when applied to particle-based systems, are transductive in nature and hence, do not generalize to large system sizes. In this paper, we present a graph-based neural ODE, GNODE, to learn the time evolution of dynamical systems. Further, we carefully analyze the role of different inductive biases on the performance of GNODE. We show that similar to LNN and HNN, encoding the constraints explicitly can significantly improve the training efficiency and performance of GNODE significantly. Our experiments also assess the value of additional inductive biases, such as Newton’s third law, on the final performance of the model. We demonstrate that inducing these biases can enhance the performance of the model by orders of magnitude in terms of both energy violation and rollout error. Interestingly, we observe that the GNODE trained with the most effective inductive biases, namely MCGNODE, outperforms the graph versions of LNN and HNN, namely, Lagrangian graph networks (LGN) and Hamiltonian graph networks (HGN) in terms of energy violation error by ∼4 orders of magnitude for a pendulum system, and ∼2 orders of magnitude for spring systems. These results suggest that NODE-based systems can give competitive performances with energy-conserving neural networks by employing appropriate inductive biases.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 3cdcde85-7855-4036-b7c3-50eff3957927Cited by top-tier papers4
- Reversible and irreversible bracket-based dynamics for deep graph neural networksAnthony Gruber, Kookjin Lee, Nathaniel TraskNeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
- CARE: Modeling Interacting Dynamics Under Temporal Environmental VariationXiao Luo, Haixin Wang, Zijie Huang, Huiyu Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- DGNet: Discrete Green Networks for Data-Efficient Learning of Spatiotemporal PDEsYingjie Tan, Quanming Yao, Yaqing WangICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- GFFMERGE: Efficient Merging of Graph Neural Force Fields and BeyondParth Verma, Parv P Singh, Vipul Garg, Ishita Thakre et al.ICML 2026
Related papers
- Learning Articulated Rigid Body Dynamics with Lagrangian Graph Neural NetworkRavinder Bhattoo, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop KrishnanNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- Deconstructing the Inductive Biases of Hamiltonian Neural NetworksNate Gruver, Marc Anton Finzi, Samuel Don Stanton, Andrew Gordon WilsonICLR 2022 · 50 citations
- Constraint-based graph network simulatorYulia Rubanova, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Tobias Pfaff, Peter W. BattagliaICML 2022 · 34 citations
- BroGNet: Momentum-Conserving Graph Neural Stochastic Differential Equation for Learning Brownian DynamicsSuresh Bishnoi, Jayadeva, Sayan Ranu, N. M. Anoop KrishnanICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with ControlYaofeng Desmond Zhong, Biswadip Dey, Amit ChakrabortyICLR 2020 · 319 citations
