TabStruct: Measuring Structural Fidelity of Tabular Data
Xiangjian Jiang, Nikola Simidjievski, Mateja Jamnik
Abstract
Evaluating tabular generators remains a challenging problem, as the unique causal structural prior of heterogeneous tabular data does not lend itself to intuitive human inspection. Recent work has introduced structural fidelity as a tabular-specific evaluation dimension to assess whether synthetic data complies with the causal structures of real data. However, existing benchmarks often neglect the interplay between structural fidelity and conventional evaluation dimensions, thus failing to provide a holistic understanding of model performance. Moreover, they are typically limited to toy datasets, as quantifying existing structural fidelity metrics requires access to ground-truth causal structures, which are rarely available for real-world datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation framework that jointly considers structural fidelity and conventional evaluation dimensions. We introduce a new evaluation metric, , which enables the assessment of structural fidelity even in the absence of ground-truth causal structures. In addition, we present , a comprehensive evaluation benchmark offering large-scale quantitative analysis on 13 tabular generators from nine distinct categories, across 29 datasets. Our results demonstrate that global utility provides a task-independent, domain-agnostic lens for tabular generator performance. We release the TabStruct benchmark suite, including all datasets, evaluation pipelines, and raw results. Code is available at https://github.com/SilenceX12138/TabStruct.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3c47cf2f-8d59-4072-9c48-ed7d11c7d488Builds on27
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion ModelsAkim Kotelnikov, Dmitry Baranchuk, Ivan Rubachev, Artem BabenkoICML 2023 · 518 citations
- Transformers Can Do Bayesian InferenceSamuel Müller, Noah Hollmann, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif Grabocka et al.ICLR 2022 · 287 citations
- How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative ModelsAhmed M. Alaa, Boris van Breugel, Evgeny S. Saveliev, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2022 · 287 citations
- TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across TablesZifeng Wang, Jimeng SunNeurIPS 2022 · 242 citations
Related papers
- TabReX: Tabular Referenceless eXplainable EvaluationTejas Anvekar, Junha Park, Aparna Garimella, Vivek GuptaACL 2026
- Systematic Assessment of Tabular Data SynthesisYuntao Du, Ninghui LiCCS 2025 · 2 citations
- AFT-Tab: Adversarial Fine-Tuning for Tabular Data Synthesis with Long Text ColumnsYuhao Zhang, Liang Yan, Shaoming Duan, Xinyu Zha et al.ACL 2026
- ConTSG-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Conditional Time Series GenerationShaocheng Lan, Shuqi Gu, Zhangzhi Xiong, Kan RenICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Benchmarking Differentially Private Tabular Data Synthesis: [Experiments & Analysis]Kai Chen, Xiaochen Li, Chen Gong, Ryan McKenna et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 4 citations
